Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said U.S. delays in approving the Keystone XL pipeline are “not a hopeful sign” and reflect the “peculiar politics” of the Obama administration.
“A positive decision has not been rendered for a very long time, that’s obviously not a hopeful sign,” Harper said in an interview June 29 at his Ottawa office, adding he discussed the matter recently with the U.S. president. “I think there’s very peculiar politics of this particular administration.”
U.S. President Barack Obama will reject the project in August, Republican Senator John Hoeven said June 28, citing unidentified “sources.” TransCanada Corp.’s proposed $8 billion link between Alberta crude deposits and Gulf Coast refineries has been under review since 2008.
Harper said a rejection of the pipeline “is clearly possible,” when asked about Hoeven’s comments.
The White House refused to comment on the status of the Keystone review, with spokesman Eric Schultz saying the matter was being handled at the State Department.
Schultz said he hadn’t read or heard Hoeven’s statement and knew nothing about what he based the assertion on. “I’m not sure I would classify him as a confidante of the State Department.”
‘No-Brainer’
Getting the project approved has been among Harper’s highest-priority diplomatic efforts. He called the project a “no-brainer” in a 2011 interview.
A rejection of the project in the next few months could be a setback for Harper heading into Oct. 19 elections. His government’s position has consistently been that Keystone offers job creation and the displacement of oil imports from countries that can be hostile to the U.S.
Keystone has become one of the most controversial energy issues of Obama’s presidency. He has questioned its benefits to the U.S. and vetoed a Republican-backed bill that would have bypassed a State Department review and allowed construction.
“The fact a decision has not been rendered for so long, even after all the objective analyses said that the project is better from an economic standpoint, an energy standpoint, even an environmental standpoint -- it’s certainly preferable to rail -- even after all those things, a decision hasn’t been rendered,” Harper said. “I believe that whether this project goes ahead or not under this administration, it will ultimately go ahead under a subsequent administration.”
Recommended Reading
Exxon Versus Chevron: The Fight for Hess’ 30% Guyana Interest
2024-03-04 - Chevron's plan to buy Hess Corp. and assume a 30% foothold in Guyana has been complicated by Exxon Mobil and CNOOC's claims that they have the right of first refusal for the interest.
Petrobras to Step Up Exploration with $7.5B in Capex, CEO Says
2024-03-26 - Petrobras CEO Jean Paul Prates said the company is considering exploration opportunities from the Equatorial margin of South America to West Africa.
The OGInterview: How do Woodside's Growth Projects Fit into its Portfolio?
2024-04-01 - Woodside Energy CEO Meg O'Neill discusses the company's current growth projects across the globe and the impact they will have on the company's future with Hart Energy's Pietro Pitts.
Petrobras Sending Nearly Half of Oil Exports to China
2024-04-30 - Conflict in the Middle East has enabled Brazil’s state-owned Petrobras to change the flow of its oil exports, with China being the primary beneficiary, followed by Europe.
Tech Trends: Halliburton’s Carbon Capturing Cement Solution
2024-02-20 - Halliburton’s new CorrosaLock cement solution provides chemical resistance to CO2 and minimizes the impact of cyclic loading on the cement barrier.