Trans Mountain Corp. plans to begin line fill in March or May on its long-delayed Canadian oil pipeline expansion, depending on the diameter of pipe it uses and assuming no new problems, the Canadian government-owned company said in a filing on Jan. 3.
The company is awaiting a regulatory decision on its request for a construction change.
Line fill is a final step before the expanded Alberta-to-British Columbia pipeline begins service, providing crucial additional access for Canadian oil to refineries on the U.S. West Coast and in Asia.
The project will nearly triple the pipeline's shipments to 890,000 bbl/d.
Trans Mountain said the new schedules assume that it faces no delays caused by challenges drilling into hard rock, such as tool damage. Trans Mountain continues to target the end of the first quarter to begin shipping crude and is developing contingency plans to address any challenges to that schedule, a spokesperson said in an email.
Trans Mountain had asked the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) to allow it to install smaller-diameter pipe in a 1.4-mile (2.3 km) section of the oil pipeline's route after encountering challenging drilling conditions in a mountainous area between Hope and Chilliwack, British Columbia.
The CER denied the request on Dec. 5, later saying that the application did not adequately address concerns about pipeline integrity and the environment. Trans Mountain then asked the regulator to reverse that decision on Dec. 14, warning of a possibly "catastrophic" two-year delay and billions of dollars in losses.
The CER has not yet made a decision.
The pipeline can enter service within one month of mechanical completion, which precedes line fill, Trans Mountain said in the filing.
Canadian heavy oil prices strengthened as the filing suggested Trans Mountain and the regulator are working hard to resolve construction problems, a trader said.
In Trans Mountain's 33-page filing, it told the CER it had considered numerous alternatives before settling on the revised plan for which it is seeking approval.
The company said it has faced growing problems with water flow and abnormal wear on tools as it drills into hard rock.
Under the worst-case scenario for the plan currently approved by CER, the company's horizontal directional drilling approach could fail and require a fresh alternative that may delay the project by two years to 30 months, Trans Mountain said.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberal government bought the project in 2018 to ensure the expansion went ahead, but costs have ballooned to CA$30.9 billion (US$23.14 billion), more than four times the original budget.
Recommended Reading
Petrobras to Add Two FPSOs Offshore Brazil in Second-half 2024
2024-08-12 - Petrobras will bring online 280,000 bbl/d of production capacity in the second-half 2024 with the addition of two FPSOs offshore Brazil.
IOCs See Opportunity in Offshore Mexico, Despite Potential for Policy Changes
2024-08-14 - Five IOCs with offshore experience and capital—Eni, Harbour, Talos, Wintershall Dea and Woodside—continue to pursue promising opportunities offshore Mexico despite the country’s energy sovereignty push in favor of state-owned entities Pemex and CFE.
VTX Energy Quickly Ramps to 42,000 bbl/d in Southern Delaware Basin
2024-09-24 - VTX Energy’s founder was previously among the leadership that built and sold an adjacent southern Delaware operator, Brigham Resources, for $2.6 billion.
US Drillers Cut Oil, Gas Rigs for Third Week in a Row
2024-10-04 - The oil and gas rig count fell by two to 585 in the week to Oct. 4.
EY: How AI Can Transform Subsurface Operations
2024-10-10 - The inherent complexity of subsurface data and the need to make swift decisions demands a tailored approach.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.