Everyone is familiar with the recent woes of the U.S. dollar. Currency fluctuation has the potential to cause conflicts in commercial contracts in which sellers have entered into fixed-price contracts with customers. It’s no surprise that the sellers would seek an adjustment to pricing when the currency of the contracts drops, making a sale a losing prospect. However, many buyers obviously, under the circumstances, insist on the price they bargained for.
Some sellers have attempted to use the force majeure provision present in many U.S.-based commercial contracts as their way out of a losing fixed-price arrangement with buyers. The problem, as most of these sellers are quickly discovering, is that U.S. case law almost unanimously rejects the application of force majeure provisions to currency fluctuations.
Typical force majeure provisions cover natural events, such as earthquakes and hurricanes. However, many also contain non-natural events, such as war and strikes, or the inability to secure raw materials at a certain price. In some instances, the non-U.S. seller might argue that a force majeure based on currency fluctuations is a similar non-natural event—not a particularly persuasive argument.
To obtain greater protection against such fluctuations, parties to an international contract should carefully consider the addition of stop-loss provisions that force a renegotiation when currency fluctuates by more than a certain percentage. Parties can also consider the use of an automatic-adjustment provision based on rates published by a third party.
A compromise approach can also include the use of a “collar” that permits currency fluctuations to change within a certain range before a price adjustment is triggered. The key to these provisions is detail and a clear, unambiguous reference to a well-known benchmark.
--Aaron Ball
About the author: Aaron Ball is a Houston-based attorney with Looper, Reed & McGraw and focuses on international transactions and planning for the oilfield and manufacturing industries. He can be reached at aball@lrmlaw.com and at 713-986-7000. And his blog, “Cross-Border Transactions,” is available at http://lrmlawblog.com/international/.
Recommended Reading
Keeping it Simple: Antero Stays on Profitable Course in 1Q
2024-04-26 - Bucking trend, Antero Resources posted a slight increase in natural gas production as other companies curtailed production.
Oil and Gas Chain Reaction: E&P M&A Begets OFS Consolidation
2024-04-26 - Record-breaking E&P consolidation is rippling into oilfield services, with much more M&A on the way.
Exxon Mobil, Chevron See Profits Fall in 1Q Earnings
2024-04-26 - Chevron and Exxon Mobil are feeling the pinch of weak energy prices, particularly natural gas, and fuels margins that have cooled in the last year.
Marathon Oil Declares 1Q Dividend
2024-04-26 - Marathon Oil’s first quarter 2024 dividend is payable on June 10.
Talos Energy Expands Leadership Team After $1.29B QuarterNorth Deal
2024-04-25 - Talos Energy President and CEO Tim Duncan said the company has expanded its leadership team as the company integrates its QuarterNorth Energy acquisition.