President Donald Trump the state of California went to war on Sept. 18 over who should set the standards in the United States for vehicle emissions and electric cars.
In a morning flurry of tweets, Trump confirmed he will revoke California's authority to require automakers to build cleaner vehicles than federal requirements demand.
The Republican president is counting on voters in truck-friendly heartland states to carry him to re-election in 2020, and he portrayed his decision as a win for consumers. Trump tweeted that vehicles would be "far less expensive" and "substantially SAFER" --claims California officials rejected.
Trump, who is in California this week, urged automakers to back the action, which could also eliminate electric vehicle mandates in a dozen states that follow California's regulatory lead.
The announcement will not immediately lead to revised emissions requirements, but the Trump administration plans to announce this autumn a separate rule to dramatically roll back Obama-era fuel-efficiency standards agreed with California, advancing a multipronged attack on the state's efforts to reshape the mix of vehicles driven by Americans.
"Automakers should seize this opportunity because without this alternative to California, you will be out of business," Trump tweeted.
So far, none have publicly supported revocation of California's authority.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group representing General Motors Co, Toyota Motor Corp , Volkswagen AG, Ford Motor Co and others, declined to take a position on Trump's revocation of California's waiver, saying automakers will review the decision "to get the full picture of how this impacts automakers, our workers and our customers."
Tom Pyle, CEO of the American Energy Alliance said in a statement, “We commend President Trump on his decision to ensure that consumers can make the decisions about what cars and trucks they should buy. While there are some who would rather have those decisions made by bureaucrats in California, we believe that workers, consumers, and families can and should be trusted to make decisions that affect their lives.
“The Administration’s efforts to reform this ill-conceived and wickedly regressive mandate will save consumers money, preserve their choices, and ensure that the federal government, and not California, sets national fuel efficiency policy."
On Wednesday morning, California Governor Gavin Newsom, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and Mary Nichols, the state's top clean air regulator, appeared at a news conference in Sacramento and denounced Trump's action as a "political vendetta" that risks damage to the climate and public health and would leave the U.S. auto industry behind in a global race to develop electric vehicle technology.
The Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Transportation Department plan to announce on Thursday that the government is revoking an EPA waiver California received in 2013 to set state emissions rules and will hold a news conference to discuss the decision.
Newsom, Becerra and Nichols said the state will go to court to challenge the administration's action once it is official.
When asked about Trump’s move, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Wednesday he was opposed to it. “I’m strongly in favor of a decentralized approach to these measures and I’m strongly against any reduction of that decentralization," he told reporters. "I think it’s important - and this is true for many countries in the world - that cities and states and regions have a capacity to develop all positive measures in relation to climate action.”
The fight over highly technical emissions rules will play out in the political arena where the issues are more visceral.
Trump and other administration officials have framed their decision as a move to protect consumers from regulatory mandates that would drive up the cost of vehicles, and force heartland truck owners to pay more for their vehicles to subsidize the sale of money-losing electric cars to wealthy coastal dwellers.
California officials, Democratic presidential candidates and environmental groups countered that Trump's action benefits only the oil industry.
Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune said the environmental group would file suit to challenge the move, calling it "nothing more than pure vindictiveness from an administration set on giving Big Oil a polluting pass at the expense of our climate and the well-being of American families."
The auto emissions battle is just one front in a widening battle between the Trump administration and California's Democratic administration. The White House and the leaders of the largest U.S. state have also locked horns over high-speed rail funding, border wall funding and immigration regulations.
Trump has also moved to roll back other Obama-era climate change regulations California's leaders support.
Under Trump, federal regulators have backed freezing emissions requirements for new cars and trucks at 2020 levels through 2026. Administration officials say the final regulation will include a modest boost in annual efficiency requirements but far less than what the Obama administration set in 2012. At the time, California agreed to adopt the Obama rules rather than set its own standards.
The Obama-era rules called for a fleetwide fuel efficiency average of 46.7 miles (75 km) per gallon by 2025, with average annual increases of about 5%, compared with 37 mpg by 2026 under the Trump administration’s preferred option to freeze requirements.
The Trump plan's preferred option would increase U.S. oil consumption by about 500,000 barrels per day by the 2030s but reduce automakers regulatory costs by more than $300 billion.
Rio Oil and Gas II retained Detring Energy Advisors for the sale of a core Delaware Basin asset in Ward County, Texas, operated by Chevron in an offering closing Nov. 20.
Council Oak Resources retained Meagher Energy Advisors for the sale of Arkoma Basin nonoperated leasehold and minerals located in Hughes, Okfuskee and Okmulgee counties, Okla.
A Travis Peak Resources affiliate retained Detring for the sale certain of its oil and gas assets located in Grady County, Okla., throughout the core of the prolific Merge area.