[Editor’s note: This story was updated at 1:35 p.m. CT Dec. 10.]
U.S. taxpayers netted less than $50,000 on Dec. 10 in bids for oil and gas leases in California as the Trump administration held the first federal drilling auction since 2012 in the Democratic and environmentally minded state.
The auction for drilling rights on seven parcels covering 4,100 acres (16.6 sq km) generated $46,148.64, according to results on the auction site EnergyNet.
The average price per acre was $11, far below the nearly $330-an-acre average price federal lease sales have generated throughout the Trump administration, according to data compiled by green group Center for Western Priorities.
Leasing is a key part of President Donald Trump's agenda to increase fossil fuel development, but many sale results have been lackluster this year as the coronavirus pandemic has slammed energy demand and prices.
The parcels sold on Dec. 10 in California's Kern County, home to most of the state's drilling activity, had been previously leased, according to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which oversaw the sale.
The auction in the waning days of Trump’s administration represents yet another clash between his pro-fossil fuel agenda and the Golden State's efforts to combat climate change. Throughout his four-year term, the battle has been waged on issues ranging from auto emissions to curbs on pollution from the power sector.
President-elect Joe Biden, a Democrat who will succeed Trump on Jan. 20, has pledged to halt new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and waters as part of a sweeping plan to fight global warming.
Federal drilling auctions in California were halted in 2013 after state officials filed lawsuits challenging the practice on environmental and health grounds.
BLM concluded last December that opening the lands to development presents no health risks.
State officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, filed a formal protest against the sale with BLM last month.
BLM dismissed the protest ahead of the auction, saying the state's arguments against the sale had been resolved during the environmental review process.
Recommended Reading
CEO Darren Woods: What’s Driving Permian M&A for Exxon, Other E&Ps
2024-03-18 - Since acquiring XTO for $36 billion in 2010, Exxon Mobil has gotten better at drilling unconventional shale plays. But it needed Pioneer’s high-quality acreage to keep running in the Permian Basin, CEO Darren Woods said at CERAWeek by S&P Global.
Uinta Basin's XCL Seeks FTC OK to Buy Altamont Energy
2024-03-07 - XCL Resources is seeking approval from the Federal Trade Commission to acquire fellow Utah producer Altamont Energy LLC.
Analysts: Why Are Investors Snapping Up Gulfport Energy Stock?
2024-02-29 - Shares for Oklahoma City-based Gulfport Energy massively outperformed market peers over the past year—and analysts think the natural gas-weighted name has even more upside.
SilverBow Saga: Investor Urges E&P to Take Kimmeridge Deal
2024-03-21 - Kimmeridge’s proposal to combine Eagle Ford players Kimmeridge Texas Gas (KTG) and SilverBow Resources is gaining support from another large investor.
Mesa III Reloads in Haynesville with Mineral, Royalty Acquisition
2024-04-03 - After Mesa II sold its Haynesville Shale portfolio to Franco-Nevada for $125 million late last year, Mesa Royalties III is jumping back into Louisiana and East Texas, as well as the Permian Basin.