British Columbia on April 26 asked a court to decide the province has the power to restrict increased heavy crude shipments to its coast due to oil spill fears and said it was “highly unlikely” the case would be resolved before the deadline for a controversial pipeline expansion.
The western Canadian province, which is opposed to Kinder Morgan Canada’s planned Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, said it had filed its so-called reference question in the B.C. Court of Appeal.
The case seeks “to confirm the scope and extent of provincial powers to regulate environmental and economic risks related to heavy oils like diluted bitumen,” British Columbia Attorney General David Eby told reporters.
Eby added that the matter was “highly unlikely” to be resolved by a May 31 deadline set by Kinder Morgan to decide if construction would proceed or not on the CA$7.4 billion (US$5.8 billion) project.
Kinder Morgan halted work on the expansion earlier this month, citing resistance from the Pacific Coast province, and said it would the scrap the project if it does not receive the certainty it needed by its deadline.
That has sent the federal government and the oil-rich province of Alberta scrambling to provide the company with financial and political support for the project, which would nearly triple capacity on an existing pipeline from Alberta to the B.C. coast.
The development is supported by Canadian energy producers, who face steep discounts on their product due to a lack of transportation capacity. It is opposed by B.C., some municipalities, some aboriginal groups and environmental activists, who worry about spills.
The province’s filing comes as Canada Environment Minister Catherine McKenna sent a letter to her B.C. counterpart, offering to work with the province to address concerns about the safety of expanding crude shipments through the pipeline.
Canada’s ruling Liberals have insisted that they have jurisdiction over project, which they approved in 2016.
The federal government said last week that it was still in talks with Kinder Morgan on financial support to help ensure the project goes ahead, even as the company warned that B.C.’s continuing opposition was making an investment untenable.
Recommended Reading
Analysts: Diamondback-Endeavor Deal Creates New Permian Super Independent
2024-02-12 - The tie-up between Diamondback Energy and Endeavor Energy—two of the Permian’s top oil producers—is expected to create a new “super-independent” E&P with a market value north of $50 billion.
Sold in 66 Days: Inside the Diamondback-Endeavor Deal
2024-03-26 - Diamondback Chairman and CEO Travis Stice first offered “at least $25 billion” for Endeavor Energy Resources on Dec. 8. The deal closed just weeks later for $26 billion.
Daugherty: Diamondback Scales Up Amid Consolidation Super Cycle
2024-03-11 - It’s time for the strongest among the services sector to follow Diamondback's lead: find fortifying prey and hunt.
Is Double Eagle IV the Most Coveted PE-backed Permian E&P Left?
2024-04-22 - Double Eagle IV is quietly adding leases and drilling new oil wells in core parts of the Midland Basin. After a historic run of corporate consolidation, is it the most attractive private equity-backed E&P still standing in the Permian Basin?
EIA: E&P Dealmaking Activity Soars to $234 Billion in ‘23
2024-03-19 - Oil and gas E&Ps spent a collective $234 billion on corporate M&A and asset acquisitions in 2023, the most in more than a decade, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported.