The concentration of private equity ownership in E&Ps has largely diminished according to a Truist Securities review of more than 30 producers that the firm covers—and the overhang on operators could lessen even more in the future.

“We now think it will be less of an issue for many E&P companies, in part due to their ability to participate in a sale and in part due to more methodical exits of their positions versus prior years, where private equity groups would like to liquidate their positions as soon as their lockups expired,” Bertrand Donnes, Truist Securities energy research analyst, told Hart Energy.
Donnes’ equity research found that total private ownership of the E&Ps Truist analyzed are “not as widespread as in the past,” and “recent sales of various private equity E&Ps have had little impact on share price.”
And total private-equity ownership will likely remain flat, or fall, given what’s likely to be a limited number of new operating teams added to private equity’s portfolio companies.
RELATED: Warburg Pincus Unloads Remaining Earthstone Energy Shares
The report predicted that most future full asset sales will be cash deals, but it also noted that some firms could “ultimately become longer term holders.”
Donnes said that’s been caused by significant changes among the E&Ps, including higher free cash flows, robust returns to shareholders and stronger balance sheets.
One surprising finding: private equity owners are now more diverse than in the past, when large investors were more dominant. Private equity sales “over past quarters decreased much of the concentrated ownership,” the report said.
Donnes said Truist does not have a figure that quantifies the size of the decrease.
Companies Truist studied include EQT, Diamondback Energy, Devon Energy, Chesapeake Energy, Southwestern Energy Company and Magnolia Oil & Gas.
The analysis found two companies with more than 50% private equity ownership, Crescent Energy Co. at 57.1% and Riley Exploration Permian Inc., at 53.5%. SilverBow Resources Inc., was 40.6% private equity ownership, and Ring Energy was 25.1%.
Hundreds of private equity owned properties that remain in the group Truist studied could come to market in the next several months, but Truist expects private equity ownership to remain at today’s levels or lower.
“Essentially, we don’t expect there to be many private assets purchased by the public names, which is the primary way that private equity firms end up owning large amounts of public shares, as the public companies buy the assets with equity,” Donnes said. “We expect the existing positions to either hold at current levels given the attractive multiples/payouts from the E&P group or slowly reduce their positions given the recent run up in the equities.”
Recommended Reading
Energy Sector Sees Dramatic Increase in Private Equity Funding
2024-11-21 - In a 10-day period, private equity firms announced almost $20 billion in energy funding. Is an end in sight for the fossil fuel capital drought?
E&P Consolidation Ripples Through Energy Finance Providers
2024-11-29 - Panel: The pool of financial companies catering to oil and gas companies has shrunk along with the number of E&Ps.
Utica Liftoff: Infinity Natural Resources’ Shares Jump 10% in IPO
2025-01-31 - Infinity Natural Resources CEO Zack Arnold told Hart Energy the newly IPO’ed company will stick with Ohio oil, Marcellus Shale gas.
Pearl Energy Investments Closes Fund IV with $999.9MM
2025-02-04 - Pearl Energy Investments’ Fund IV met its hard cap within four months of launching and closed on Jan. 31.
Utica Oil’s Infinity IPO Values its Play at $48,000 per Boe/d
2025-01-30 - Private-equity-backed Infinity Natural Resources’ IPO pricing on Jan. 30 gives a first look into market valuation for Ohio’s new tight-oil Utica play. Public trading is to begin the morning of Jan. 31.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.