Increased U.S. and Canadian regulation of rail shipments of crude oil is likely, but the details aren’t certain. What is certain, according to Wells Fargo Securities, is the changes will raise costs for shippers. But by how much?
“Previously, we had estimated higher shipping costs from new car designs and retrofits of existing cars as adding 50 cents per barrel (bbl.) to shipping costs, a manageable incremental cost in our view,” the firm said in a recent research report.
However, new U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recommendations—which are in addition to
recommendations by the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and Federal Railroad Administration— complicate forecasting what the new oversight will look like.
The NTSB guidelines “could increase costs further as they would extend delivery times and time is money. At this time we are unable to quantify the impact as how and when the new recommendations will be implemented is unclear,” Wells Fargo said shortly after the NTSB announcement.
Key takeaways, Wells Fargo said, are that the greatest impact will be on East Coast and West Coast refiners, which have been major purchasers of light, sweet Bakken crude shipped by train.
The NTSB recommendations include:
• Routing shipments around high-population and other sensitive areas when transporting hazardous materials, including
crude. Wells Fargo observed that NTSB did not define what it meant by “populated/sensitive areas.”
• Audits to ensure railroads carrying crude have adequate response plan for worst-case emergency situations.
• Audits to assure shippers and railroads properly classify hazardous material shipments, including crude.
“In general, the potential impact of increased rail regulations should not be material to energy MLPs, in our view,” Wells
Fargo said. “Only a few partnerships have invested in rail-related infrastructure with even a smaller subset of MLPs owning/leasing railcars. Thus, while a potential regulatory change could impact MLPs involved in the rail business, the overall impact to the sector (given limited participation) should be nominal, in our view.”
Recommended Reading
Enbridge Advances Expansion of Permian’s Gray Oak Pipeline
2024-02-13 - In its fourth-quarter earnings call, Enbridge also said the Mainline pipeline system tolling agreement is awaiting regulatory approval from a Canadian regulatory agency.
CorEnergy Infrastructure to Reorganize in Pre-packaged Bankruptcy
2024-02-26 - CorEnergy, coming off a January sale of its MoGas and Omega pipeline and gathering systems, filed for bankruptcy protect after reaching an agreement with most of its debtors.
Canadian Natural Resources Boosting Production in Oil Sands
2024-03-04 - Canadian Natural Resources will increase its quarterly dividend following record production volumes in the quarter.
Bobby Tudor on Capital Access and Oil, Gas Participation in the Energy Transition
2024-04-05 - Bobby Tudor, the founder and CEO of Artemis Energy Partners, says while public companies are generating cash, private equity firms in the upstream business are facing more difficulties raising new funds, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Genesis Energy Declares Quarterly Dividend
2024-04-11 - Genesis Energy declared a quarterly distribution for the quarter ended March 31 for both common and preferred units.