A North Carolina regulatory agency on Aug. 11 denied a water quality certification request for the Mountain Valley Pipeline’s (MVP) Southgate project, citing uncertainty that the MVP Mainline project will be completed.
The state’s Department of Environmental Quality’s Division of Water Resources said in a statement that work on the extension could lead to unnecessary water quality impacts and environment issues in North Carolina. The agency also opposed additional natural gas infrastructure in the state.
“This has always been an unnecessary project that poses unnecessary risks to our environment and, given the uncertain future of the MVP Mainline, North Carolinians should not be exposed to the risk of another incomplete pipeline project,” said Michael Regan, secretary of the department.
The 75-mi. interstate Southgate project was announced in April 2018. The extension to the Mountain Valley Pipeline is designed to start in Pittsylvania County, Va., and reach to delivery points in Rockingham and Alamance counties, N.C. Total capacity for the pipeline, operated by EQM Midstream Partners, is 900 MMcf/d.
Under terms of the permits issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southgate could not proceed until the Mountain Valley Pipeline mainline had all of its permits approved.
“Projects like this slow down the state’s goal to reduce greenhouse gases under North Carolina’s Clean Energy Plan and our efforts to address climate change under Executive Order 80,” Regan said. “We should invest in clean, renewable energy sources and the economic benefits of energy innovation.”
The $5.4 billion Mountain Valley Pipeline is expected to be completed in early 2021 but has run into regulatory issues that have slowed its progress. Construction is complete on more than 90% of the 303-mile pipeline’s route. It is designed to carry up to 2 billion cf/d of gas from the Marcellus and Utica shales to customers in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast markets.
Recommended Reading
Hirs: Energy’s Best Strategy for the Presidential Election? Support Both Sides
2024-01-12 - The upcoming presidential election sees energy concerns on the “second page” of the ballot, making choosing a side a necessity.
Belcher: Energy Policy Outlook for 2024
2024-01-11 - Expect energy policy to be a dominant theme in the 2024 elections.
California Reaming: Laws Spark Rancor, $6B in Chevron, Exxon Write Offs
2024-01-08 - Chevron and Exxon are set to write off billions of dollars worth of California assets because of strict laws and regulations that the companies say won’t change oil consumption but will shift profits to foreign producers such as Saudi Arabia.
Pitts: Is Vaca Muerta Argentina’s Permian?
2024-01-07 - Can Argentina’s Vaca Muerta Shale play truly garner the title of the Permian 2.0, which is a play that replicates the Permian Basin’s success? Yes, in terms of geology and game-changing potential, but no in terms of eventual production volumes.
CEO: Linde Not Affected by Latest US Green Subsidies Package Updates
2024-02-07 - Linde CEO Sanjiv Lamba on Feb. 6 said recent updates to U.S. Inflation Reduction Act subsidies for clean energy projects will not affect the company's current projects in the United States.