WASHINGTON—A U.S. Senate committee passed a bill on July 31 to slap sanctions on companies and individuals involved in building the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Germany that the Trump administration says would strengthen Moscow’s economic grip on Europe.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed the “Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act,” by a vote of 20-2. The bill, which reflects some lawmakers’ concerns over Russian influence in Europe, would still need to pass the full Senate and House of Representatives and be signed by President Donald Trump into law.
A companion bill passed the House Foreign Affairs Committee last month.
“Russia has a history of using energy as a weapon,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), one of the measure’s sponsors.
The Nord Stream 2 project, which has mostly been completed, is led by the Russian state-owned gas company Gazprom, with half of the funding provided by Germany’s Uniper and BASF’s Wintershall unit, Anglo-Dutch firm Shell, Austria’s OMV and France’s Engie.
The sanctions could also affect other natural gas export pipelines from Russia, including the Turk Stream project.
Cruz’s bill is one of a handful in Congress looking to impose sanctions on the project. The measure would penalize ships that lay Russian energy export pipelines at depths of 100 feet or more below sea level, a stipulation that could also apply to the Turk Stream gas pipeline.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) were the panel members who voted against the bill. Paul complained that it sanctioned U.S. allies and harmed international companies that employ thousands of Americans. The bill’s backers disputed this.
“It makes no sense to hurt people that are helping us apply pressure on Russia and in other areas,” Paul said.
Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), the panel’s top Democrat, said he backed the bill, but that it was important to reinforce U.S. ties with Berlin. Germany says Nord Stream is important to its economy, Europe’s largest, and opposes sanctions on the commercial project.
Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho), committee chairman, said the panel would also consider another bill, the bipartisan Defending American Security from Kremlin Aggression Act (DASKA), although the timing was not clear.
That bill would impose stiff sanctions on Russia over meddling in U.S. elections and aggression against Ukraine. One sponsor, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), has called it the “sanctions bill from hell.”
DASKA would impose strict measures on Russia’s oil and gas sector, which contributes about 40% of Moscow’s revenues. It would also sanction individuals who provide goods, services or financing to support development of crude oil in the country as well as Russian state-owned energy ventures outside of Russia, including investments in LNG projects.
Recommended Reading
Electrification Lights Up Need for Gas, LNG
2024-09-18 - As global power demand rises, much of the world is unable to grasp the need for gas or the connection to LNG, experts said.
Woodside to Maintain at Least 50% Interest in Driftwood LNG
2024-09-18 - Australia’s Woodside Energy plans to maintain at least a 50% interest in the 27.6 mtpa Driftwood LNG project that it's buying from Tellurian, CEO Meg O’Neill said during a media briefing at Gastech in Houston.
Ryan Lance: ConocoPhillips Wants to ‘Double’ LNG Project Portfolio
2024-09-17 - ConocoPhillips aims to ingrain itself into the global LNG ecosystem, from shale gas output at the wellhead to liquefaction to shipping to regasification in Europe and Asia, CEO Ryan Lance said.
TPH: LNG Agreements Start to Materialize, but Most Non-binding
2024-09-17 - Since the end of April, U.S. LNG export facilities have made agreements totaling 16 mtpa, or 72% of the year’s 22.5 mtpa in offtake agreements.
Chesapeake Pushes to Move 10% of US Shale Gas into Asian Markets
2024-09-17 - Chesapeake Energy is targeting getting 10% to 15% of its production onto an international index, the company’s Executive LNG Adviser Katrina Kaufman said Sept. 16 during the Asia-US LNG Roundtable.