The Biden administration broke its silence on Nov. 30 on European Union deliberations over a $65/bbl-$70/bbl Russian oil price cap, warning far lower prices cited for some Russian Urals crude shipments should be approached with caution.
A U.S. official told Reuters that recently quoted Urals prices in the $52-a-barrel range do not represent broader pricing in a very opaque market.
The official cited outside estimates showing that over the last two months, the Urals discount to benchmark Brent crude has recently been close to $23 a barrel, falling as low as $17 a barrel. With Brent trading at $85.36 a barrel on Nov. 30, a $23 discount implies a Urals price of around $62, much closer to the proposed cap level.
The U.S. Treasury has remained silent over the past week as European Union diplomats have struggled to reach consensus on a price cap level initially proposed in the $65-$70 a barrel range.
Some countries including Poland, Lithuania and Estonia have pushed for a far lower $30-a-barrel price limit, arguing this is closer to Russia's cost of production and that the west needs to squeeze Moscow's revenues harder.
But the U.S. official's comments, which signal growing concern over the EU deliberations, come just five days before a European Union embargo on Russian crude imports is set to be phased in.
Lower quoted market prices could erode support for a cap in the $60-$70 range. The U.S. official cited concerns over using prices that represent a subset of Russian oil sales.
At issue are recent prices quoted by Argus Media and S&P Platt's in the past week of around $52 at key Black Sea and Baltic export terminals and cited by Bloomberg.
The U.S. official said such prices do not include transportation and other costs associated with Russian crudes. A price cap of $65 a barrel on Russian crude would represent a meaningful price reduction from recent prices, citing an estimated average of $78/bbl since March 2022.
The Treasury has been promoting the price cap idea to European allies since the spring of 2022, as they considered and agreed on their phased ban on Russian oil imports to punish Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine.
The cap was conceived as a way to limit Moscow's oil revenues while keeping Russian crude on the global market to avoid a massive spike in oil prices.
The price cap will be enforced by denying insurance, shipping and other maritime services provided by G7 democracies and Australia to shipments priced above the cap.
Russia said last week it would not supply oil and gas to countries supporting the cap, but will make a final decision once it analyses final figures.
Recommended Reading
Utica’s Encino Boasts Four Pillars to Claim Top Appalachian Oil Producer
2024-11-08 - Encino’s aggressive expansion in the Utica shale has not only reshaped its business, but also set new benchmarks for operational excellence in the sector.
Houston Natural Resources to Rebrand to Cunningham Natural Resources
2024-11-08 - Now rebranded as Cunningham Natural Resources Corp., the company will continue its focus on traditional oil and gas opportunities and energy transition materials.
US Oil, Gas Rig Count Holds Steady for Record Third Week
2024-11-08 - The oil and gas rig count was steady at 585 in the week to Nov. 8, Baker Hughes said on Nov. 8. Baker Hughes said that puts the total rig count down 31 rigs, or 5% below this time last year.
SM, Crescent Testing New Benches in Oily, Stacked Uinta Basin
2024-11-05 - The operators are landing laterals in zones in the estimated 17 stacked benches in addition to the traditional Uteland Butte.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.