The Biden administration broke its silence on Nov. 30 on European Union deliberations over a $65/bbl-$70/bbl Russian oil price cap, warning far lower prices cited for some Russian Urals crude shipments should be approached with caution.
A U.S. official told Reuters that recently quoted Urals prices in the $52-a-barrel range do not represent broader pricing in a very opaque market.
The official cited outside estimates showing that over the last two months, the Urals discount to benchmark Brent crude has recently been close to $23 a barrel, falling as low as $17 a barrel. With Brent trading at $85.36 a barrel on Nov. 30, a $23 discount implies a Urals price of around $62, much closer to the proposed cap level.
The U.S. Treasury has remained silent over the past week as European Union diplomats have struggled to reach consensus on a price cap level initially proposed in the $65-$70 a barrel range.
Some countries including Poland, Lithuania and Estonia have pushed for a far lower $30-a-barrel price limit, arguing this is closer to Russia's cost of production and that the west needs to squeeze Moscow's revenues harder.
But the U.S. official's comments, which signal growing concern over the EU deliberations, come just five days before a European Union embargo on Russian crude imports is set to be phased in.
Lower quoted market prices could erode support for a cap in the $60-$70 range. The U.S. official cited concerns over using prices that represent a subset of Russian oil sales.
At issue are recent prices quoted by Argus Media and S&P Platt's in the past week of around $52 at key Black Sea and Baltic export terminals and cited by Bloomberg.
The U.S. official said such prices do not include transportation and other costs associated with Russian crudes. A price cap of $65 a barrel on Russian crude would represent a meaningful price reduction from recent prices, citing an estimated average of $78/bbl since March 2022.
The Treasury has been promoting the price cap idea to European allies since the spring of 2022, as they considered and agreed on their phased ban on Russian oil imports to punish Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine.
The cap was conceived as a way to limit Moscow's oil revenues while keeping Russian crude on the global market to avoid a massive spike in oil prices.
The price cap will be enforced by denying insurance, shipping and other maritime services provided by G7 democracies and Australia to shipments priced above the cap.
Russia said last week it would not supply oil and gas to countries supporting the cap, but will make a final decision once it analyses final figures.
Recommended Reading
Exxon CEO Woods Argues Against Scope 3
2023-03-10 - Exxon Mobil Corp. CEO Darren Woods argued during CERAWeek by S&P Global in Houston that applying Scope 3 measures to a specific company had its downsides, although he said the Scope 3 measure for the GHG protocols was relevant at the macro level.
Chevron CEO Mike Wirth on Structural Changes to Gas Markets, Permian ‘Challenges’
2023-03-07 - Speaking during the CERAWeek by S&P Global conference, Chevron Chairman and CEO Mike Wirth said Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will have long-lasting effects on global natural gas markets while labor, supplies remain challenging in the Permian.
U.S. NatGas Price Volatility? ‘No Sympathy’ From Europe, Says Tellurian’s Simões
2023-03-21 - Octávio Simões, Tellurian Inc.’s president and CEO, also discussed “the saint from Scandinavia” — activist Greta Thunberg — and a world without hydrocarbons as, “just watching a car crash.”
Can Governments, Oil and Gas Players, Be Permitted to Get Along?
2023-03-10 - Governmental measures at the start of the Ukraine war to stabilize oil and gas markets did not ease distrust from the industry.