Climate activists at Greenpeace plan to mount a legal challenge against the British authorities allowing Shell Plc to develop the Jackdaw North Sea gas field, after a similar case against a BP field was initially rejected by a court.
The future of oil and gas fields such as Jackdaw has become a lightning rod for climate activists who are increasingly taking to the courts to challenge lawmakers on their pledges to turn Britain into a net zero carbon economy by 2050.
Last week, a court asked the government to revise its climate strategy and present a more detailed plan to lawmakers on how to achieve net zero after climate activists brought a case.
The government says Britain, whose oil and gas reserves are exploited by firms such as Shell rather than a national oil company, needs to boost domestic production, which is in decline, to shore up energy security.
Shell made a final investment decision on July 25 to develop Jackdaw, which is expected to come onstream in the mid-2020s and could provide 6% of U.K. gas output.
Authorities initially rejected Shell’s plans on environmental grounds but gave the green light after Shell changed the way the project would deal with operational emissions.
Greenpeace says the government is wrong to take operational emissions only into account when granting permission to extract fossil fuels.
It argues planet-warming gases produced from the burning of the fuels, typically a much bigger amount than operational emissions, should also be reflected in any decision.
“Meanwhile, household bills are soaring, and the government is ignoring common sense–like home insulation, heat pumps and cheap renewable power,” Greenpeace said.
A similar case brought by Greenpeace over BP Plc’s Vorlich oil field was initially rejected by a Scottish court, but Greenpeace has appealed this at the Supreme Court.
“We are aware of Greenpeace’s legal challenge against the U.K. regulator in relation to the Jackdaw consent decision,” a Shell spokesperson said. “The court will decide in due course on whether this challenge is allowed to proceed... we are progressing the project.”
Recommended Reading
Elk Range Royalties Makes Entry in Appalachia with Three-state Deal
2024-03-28 - NGP-backed Elk Range Royalties signed its first deal for mineral and royalty interests in Appalachia, including locations in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia.
Marketed: EnCore Permian Holdings 17 Asset Packages
2024-03-05 - EnCore Permian Holdings LP has retained EnergyNet for the sale of 17 asset packages available on EnergyNet's platform.
Marketed: Rock Oil Holdings Mineral, Royalty Opportunity in Midland Basin
2024-04-09 - Rock Oil Holdings has retained PetroDivest Advisors for the sale of a mineral and royalty opportunity in Howard County, Midland Basin.
Sitio Royalties Dives Deeper in D-J with $150MM Acquisition
2024-02-29 - Sitio Royalties is deepening its roots in the D-J Basin with a $150 million acquisition—citing regulatory certainty over future development activity in Colorado.
Marketed: Amati Royalties Powder River Basin Opportunity
2024-03-01 - Amati Royalties has retained EnergyNet for the sale of a Powder River Basin opportunity with four wells and two pending wells in Campbell County, Wyoming.