We would all like to know how to run an E&P to its optimum advantage, including stock price. You know, just turn a knob or two to make a couple of adjustments, and then see its operations and profitability hit full stride. However, changing one or two of the many variables can set off a chain reaction. Further, if you’re in a commodity business, the swings in terms of economic outcomes can be notoriously wide.
Since the summer slump in energy equities, the oil and gas industry’s mantra of capital discipline has only grown louder. In seeking an appropriate balance between value and growth, prioritizing value and a return of capital to investors—through, say, a dividend or a stock buyback—clearly has the upper hand.
“Looking into next year, it is clear that management teams have gotten the memo that investors won’t reward outspending (cash flow) to deliver growth,” said Guggenheim analyst Michael LaMotte.
Analysts’ score cards of E&Ps’ third-quarter earnings confirm the shift in strategy. For example, of 38 E&Ps it covers, 28 emphasized returns over growth, according to Guggenheim. For North American E&Ps covered by Tudor Pickering, Holt & Co. (TPH), free cash flow (cash flow in excess of capex) was cited as an issue dominating 80% of earnings calls.
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., in particular, has long said that it runs its operations “with growth as an output, not an objective.” In mid-November, it set 2018 capital investment guidelines at $4.2- to 4.6 billion, a level representing cash-flow breakevens at $50 per barrel (bbl) and $3 per thousand cubic feet. At strip pricing, generating $5- to 5.4 billion in cash flow, Anadarko clearly would enjoy “material free cash flow.”
In such a scenario of higher strip pricing and substantial free cash flow, Anadarko would look at ways it could “most efficiently” provide shareholder returns, according to CEO Al Walker. “If we have a whole lot more cash than we anticipate today, we’ll look for different ways beyond share buybacks in order to bring some of that cash back to the shareholder,” he said.
Last September, Anadarko led its peers in announcing a $2.5-billion program to buy back about 10% of outstanding shares. The program set a target of completing a $1 billion accelerated share repurchase by year-end 2017 and completing the remaining $1.5 billion over the course of this year. In addition to the share repurchase program, Anadarko said it expects “cash dividends to increase over time.”
Along with Anadarko, Devon Energy Corp. is highlighted in a report by Macquarie Capital (USA) titled, “The Race to Embrace Returns.” Analyst Paul Grigel studied moves made in the energy industry to link management incentives more closely to return metrics. He cited favorably comments by Devon that its 2018 capital program “is being designed to optimize returns, not production growth.”
Among changing trends in how investors evaluate the E&P sector, TPH reported less weight given by the buyside to a traditional net asset value (NAV) metric. Instead, over the last year, it observed a “growing emphasis on Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA, cash flow growth per debt-adjusted share, free cash-flow yields, return on capital employed, etc.” It attributed the shift in part to analysts having to cover more sectors than just energy “to stay relevant” in their firms.
But if the seeds of these changes were sown in the downturn, will the post-OPEC oil price run-up lure E&Ps back to a growth metric—especially if West Texas Intermediate moves up to the mid-$50s and higher, allowing E&Ps to lock in hedges at attractive prices?
In a report preceding the Nov. 30, 2017, meeting, Macquarie analyst Grigel said if crude prices move significantly higher, steps to grow production “should only be taken if the company is able to capture the same or better margins, as service costs will likely increase as well.” Increased hedging would “provide a cushion should prices fall and margins contract,” he noted.
If this means a more moderate, returns-based strategy ends up incorporating incremental growth, do U.S. producers risk overproducing again? Do analysts really have a handle on the eventual trajectory of the U.S. industry?
Those sharing in the gamble are OPEC and its non-OPEC allies, who also struggled to get their arms around the likely growth of U.S. unconventional production. Industry analysts invited to present to OPEC reportedly presented U.S. growth trajectories ranging from 500,000 bbl/d to 1.7 MMbbl/d—no small spread for a bet critical to oil.
Recommended Reading
Pemex Targets Debt Declining Below $100 Billion This Summer
2024-07-19 - Mexico’s state-owned Pemex, the world’s most indebted company, is targeting a total debt below the $100 billion mark this summer—the first time in 10 years that the company’s debt would be below that level.
Offshore Guyana: ‘The Place to Spend Money’
2024-07-09 - Exxon Mobil, Hess and CNOOC are prepared to pump as much as $105 billion into the vast potential of the Stabroek Block.
Endeavor Energy Founder Autry Stephens Dies at 86
2024-08-16 - Stephens created a legacy in the Permian Basin that Endeavor said will continue to shape the future of the company.
Superior Sees Executive Leadership Changes
2024-08-15 - Superior Energy Services’ president, CEO and chairman Brian Moore is retiring, and his roles are to be split between the two people succeeding him.
CEO: Baker Hughes Lands $3.5B in New Contracts in ‘Age of Gas’
2024-07-26 - Baker Hughes revised down its global upstream spending outlook for the year due to “North American softness” with oil activity recovery in second half unlikely to materialize, President and CEO Lorenzo Simonelli said.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.