Exxon Mobil Corp. is advancing a carbon capture and storage project along the U.S. Gulf of Mexico through talks with rivals and government officials, CEO Darren Woods said in an interview on April 30.
The largest U.S. oil producer this month floated a public-private initiative that would collect and sequester planet-warming CO₂ emissions from petrochemical plants along the Houston Ship Channel, a 50-mile (80-km) long waterway that is part of the Port of Houston.
Woods declined to identify by name the businesses Exxon Mobil hopes to attract to the project, saying he aims to lure the region’s top 50 CO₂ emitters, and is lobbying federal, state and local officials for support.
“I’ve been very involved with conversations with the mayor and the local government officials in Houston, with the governor and officials here in Texas, and at the federal level in the administration on this opportunity,” Woods said in an interview.
It would cost at least $100 billion from companies and government agencies to finance a project that could store 50 million tonnes of CO₂ by 2030 and double that amount by 2040, Exxon has said.
Watch Bobby Tudor, chairman of the Greater Houston Partnership’s energy transition initiative, discuss Exxon Mobil’s Proposed Carbon Capture Project for Houston
Exxon Mobil and U.S. rivals Chevron Corp. and Occidental Petroleum Corp. are “uniquely positioned to scale” carbon capture and storage technology, said Morgan Stanley analyst Devin McDermott in a report on April 30. The Houston Ship Channel proposal would require “new policies to drive investment,” he said.
The project faces enormous hurdles, including financing and support from government agencies for permitting and carbon regulations.
Woods compared the project to “starting a new business, like we did in Papua New Guinea, like we’re doing in Guyana, where you’ve got to bring together a lot of different factors to make those concepts work,” Woods said.
The proposal arose as Exxon Mobil faces a proxy fight over its plan to increase fossil fuel production that could greatly expand its carbon emissions. Activist hedge fund Engine No. 1 is battling the company over four board seats and the company's strategic direction.
“We’re basically working and using the channels that we’ve exercised real well over the years in terms of how do you bring together these large scale, complicated project opportunities to move the needle,” Woods said.
Occidental Petroleum said adjusted loss attributable to common stockholders was $136 million, or 15 cents per share, for the March quarter, compared with a loss of $610 million, or 65 cents per share, in the fourth quarter.
BP, which plans to sharply cut its oil output and boost its renewable energy capacity over the next decade, said in a report that despite “uneven progress,” the API was “heading in the right direction.”
The combined company, to be named Civitas Resources, will be the largest pure-play energy producer in Colorado’s Denver-Julesburg Basin, with an aggregate enterprise value of approximately $2.6 billion.