OPEC and its allies agreed on Dec. 2 to stick to their existing policy of monthly oil output increases despite fears that a U.S. release from crude reserves and the new Omicron coronavirus variant would lead to a fresh oil price rout.
Benchmark Brent crude fell more than $1 after the deal was reported, before recovering some ground to trade around $70/bbl. It is now well below October’s three-year highs above $86 but still more than 30% up on the start of 2021.
The United States has repeatedly pushed OPEC+ to accelerate output hikes as U.S. gasoline prices soared and President Joe Biden’s approval ratings slid. Faced with rebuffals, Washington said last week it and other consumers would release reserves.
Fearing another supply glut, sources said OPEC, Russia and allies, known as OPEC+, considered a range of options in talks on Dec. 2, including pausing their January hike of 400,000 bbl/d or increasing output by less than the monthly plan.
But any such move would have put OPEC+, which includes Saudi Arabia and other U.S. allies in the Gulf, on a collision course with Washington. Instead, the group rolled over its existing deal to increase output in January by 400,000 bbl/d.
“Politics triumphs over economics. Consumer countries mounted enough pressure,” said veteran OPEC observer Gary Ross. “But weaker prices now will only mean stronger later.”
Ahead of the talks, U.S. Deputy Energy Secretary David Turk indicated there might be flexibility in the U.S. release of reserves, telling Reuters on Dec. 1 that Biden’s administration could adjust the timing if oil prices dropped substantially.
OPEC+ remains concerned that the COVID-19 pandemic could once again drive down demand. Surging infections have prompted renewed restrictions in Europe and the Omicron variant has already led to new clamp downs on some international travel.
“We have to closely monitor the market to see the real effect of Omicron,” one OPEC+ delegate said after the talks.
OPEC+ ministers are next scheduled to meet on Jan. 4, but the group indicated in a statement that they could meet again before then if the market situation demanded.
Before this week’s talks Saudi Arabia and Russia, the biggest producers in OPEC+, had both said there was no need for a knee-jerk reaction.
Commenting after the OPEC+ decision, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said the oil market was balanced and global oil demand was slowly rising.
OPEC+ has been gradually unwinding record cuts agreed last year when demand cratered due to the pandemic, slashing output by about 10 million bbl/d, or 10% of global supply. Those cuts have since been scaled back to about 3.8 million bbl/d.
But OPEC+ has regularly failed to meet its output targets, producing about 700,000 bbl/d less than planned in both September and October, the International Energy Agency said.
The next meeting of the OPEC+ Joint Technical Committee is scheduled for Jan. 3, while the next meeting of the OPEC+ Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee is Jan. 4, a source said.
Recommended Reading
Voyager Midstream Buys Haynesville G&P Assets from Phillips 66
2024-09-03 - Voyager Midstream acquired about 550 miles of natural gas pipelines, 400 MMcf/d of gas processing capacity and 12,000 bbl/d of NGL production capacity.
Aethon Closes $260MM Deal for Tellurian’s Gas, Midstream Assets
2024-07-01 - The deal grows Aethon Energy’s Haynesville Shale footprint as Tellurian Inc. transitions into a pure-play LNG company.
Trace Midstream Acquires LM Energy's Delaware Basin Natgas System
2024-08-06 - Trace Midstream Partners, backed by Quantum Capital Group, will acquire LM Energy Delaware, a portfolio company of Old Ironsides Energy, with gas gathering assets in Eddy and Lea counties, New Mexico.
Exclusive: Aethon M&A Gambit Pays Off with Woodside-Tellurian Deal
2024-08-07 - Aethon Energy, already a large LNG feed-gas supplier, sees Woodside’s acquisition of Tellurian and the Driftwood LNG project as a validation of the natural gas industry’s prospects.
Firms Blast ‘Conflict-ridden’ Martin Midstream Deal, Launch Counteroffer
2024-07-11 - Two New York-based capital firms say a May proposal by Martin Resource Management to buy Martin Midstream for $100 million represents a “below market and conflict-ridden proposal,” while the firm’s own offer has been rebuffed.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.