When Plains Resources Inc. went public in 1981, its total revenues were $500,000. Twenty years later, the Houston upstream and midstream company's revenues were $6.6 billion. "We had two well-run race cars and needed two pit crews and drivers," says Plains executive Greg Armstrong. Speaking at an Independent Petroleum Association of America luncheon in Houston, he detailed the evolution of Plains over the years, including this year's corporate restructuring that is expected to increase growth opportunities for the upstream and midstream segments. Currently chairman and chief executive officer of Plains All American Pipeline LP, Armstrong was chief executive officer of the E&P and midstream companies before the restructuring. The growth of each segment has been impressive, he says. Beginning in 1980, executives focused on building production. They realized that the company's strength lay in exploitation rather than exploration. "We were in the top quartile [of exploration companies], but if you're not in the top 2%, you're road-kill." Between 1992 and 2001, pursuing an exploitation strategy, the company spent $688.3 million and added 286.3 million barrels of oil equivalent in reserves-or $2.40 per BOE. The company's compound annual growth rate was 25%. In the midstream segment, Plains executives chose a more challenging path than some of their competitors, deciding to transport oil rather than natural gas. With more than 50 grades and qualities of crude, the logistical challenges can be great. "That's a headache to someone else. It's an opportunity for us." The strategy was a success, spurring an overall return on investment of 4.9-to-1 between 1992 and 1998. It soon became apparent that the corporate structure needed to be changed to continue growth of both segments. Plains Resources was conducting its upstream activities through four wholly owned subsidiaries. Its midstream activities were conducted through its 100% ownership in Plains All American Inc., which was the general partner of, and held a 54% effective ownership interest in the pipeline business, a master limited partnership.
Recommended Reading
EnLink Expects Matterhorn Line Operational by September
2024-08-07 - EnLink’s JV partners cited the effects from Hurricane Beryl causing slight delays in the Matterhorn Express Pipeline.
Matterhorn Express, Partially Online, to Ease Permian Gas Bloat
2024-09-05 - The long-awaited Matterhorn Express pipeline is shipping small amounts of natural gas out of the Permian Basin, according to an E&P CEO.
Same Game, Fewer Players: Midstream M&A Stands Apart from E&P Sector
2024-07-15 - The midstream M&A market typically follows the E&P sector by a few months. But some aspects of the market are different this time around.
Wilson: NGLs are America’s Other Energy Export Boom
2024-08-12 - Robust outlook, interested buyers, willing investors—what’s not to like as NGLs have become America's hottest export product?
West Texas Hold ’Em: Permian Plays Pipeline Poker
2024-07-16 - The consensus is that the Permian Basin needs another major gas pipeline soon. Midstream companies are trying to figure out when … and who will make the move.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.