Working in isolation
The petroleum industry doesn’t have the luxury of designing reservoirs. Nature has provided the design, but then prevents direct examination of it by burying it under miles of rock. The industry has impressive technologies for imaging deep, complex subsurface structures and divining some of their properties, but uncertainties about hydrocarbon presence, rock properties and other parameters are still extremely challenging. The tremendous depth of expertise required in the geosciences and engineering fields and the tendency of the specialties to isolate themselves in “silos” has made our problem of understanding hydrocarbon reservoirs much like the situation of blind men exploring the elephant in the ancient fable from India: each specialty has an essential contribution but, arrived at serially and in isolation, the reservoir can be mischaracterized with potentially serious consequences.
This concern has always been an argument for reservoir modeling and simulation, but we have only recently surmounted the lengthy hypothesis/test cycle-time problems that other industries have conquered. Why? Primarily because the physics of hydrocarbon flow in reservoir rock is considerably more complex than that most other industries have to deal with. Our modeling and simulation problem is much more complicated than that of most other industries, and our legacy FD tools have just not been able to answer many important reservoir development questions or give answers to others in time to make a difference. As a consequence, our industry has largely had to experiment with the drill bit. It is often said that more than 95% of the world's reservoirs and wells are not rigorously modeled.
While many attempts have been made to apply FEM methods to reservoir-flow modeling and simulation, only recently have practical, commercial codes made their appearance.
Figure 1. Stewardship of a reservoir implies that information gathered from related assets in all stages from exploration to production is continually applied to refine the reservoir model. As the predictions become reliable, the stewards begin optimizing the exploitation of the reserves. (Image courtesy of PointCross Inc.) |
The waterfall workflow problem
A common workflow for today is virtually a waterfall process: the geoscientists do the best they can to build initial static models, which then pass, usually irretrievably, into the domain of the simulation engineers. Only if the engineers can’t successfully coerce the model to agree with the reservoir’s production data — i.e., get a “history match” — will the seismic interpreters and geologists get pulled back into the process. Many petroleum engineers dismiss the process. For the smaller discoveries of today, many will say that their reservoirs will be depleted before modeling would give any guidance for their day-to-day decisions, and they wouldn’t believe the answers anyway.
Typically, a four or five stage-gated process is used to mature exploration and exploitation of a field, and the gateposts often define an operating company’s organization. For various reasons, industry practice is to model the reservoir during or after the appraisal phase or even the development phase or, in many cases, not at all. If modeling and simulation were a quick-turnaround, credible process, it would be prominent in every single one of these lifecycle phases. That it is not demonstrates the inadequacies of legacy modeling tools.FEM becomes commercial
The use of FEM for reservoir models is more than a promise: the mathematics and equation solvers for multiphase flows through complex structures are commercially available today. FEM methods also feature fast automatic mesh generators, highly-detailed, near-well meshes for complex wells, direct modeling of the interior of hydraulic fracs and meshes that can adaptively “follow” flood fronts. However, overcoming the skepticism of the 95% of the industry whose doubts are rooted in decades of non-application (and misapplication) of reservoir modeling will be a challenge.Figure 2. Pressure distribution is shown in a 16-Well Finite Element Model with hydraulic fracs, with close-up view of mesh in and around the frac. (Image courtesy of Object Reservoir) |
As new information about the reservoir is acquired during the reservoir lifecycle (e.g., well logs, core and fluid analyses, flow data), the model set can be adjusted (Figure 1).
Thus, the complexity grows only as necessary to answer the questions at hand at the various decision points, and the modeling work done in one phase gives a big head start to the modeling necessary for subsequent phases in the lifecycle. This progression, where the reservoir “comes into focus” as the data to define it is acquired, is at the heart of the important notion of top-down reservoir modeling.
Figure 2 illustrates an increasingly important exploration and production concern in which the capabilities of FEM technology are urgently needed: understanding and efficiently exploiting tight-gas reservoirs. These plays require complex completion designs and frac strategies, well beyond the modeling capabilities of yesterday’s tools. This application requires FEM’s ability to deal with near-well flow dynamics with high precision in the same model that correctly describes large-scale issues such as drainage patterns and optimal well spacing.
Because of the high degree of automation in FEM, models can be built and tested quickly. The user typically has control when needed over the fineness of the mesh by setting the values of a few parameters. In our experience models have been built “on the fly” in meetings where the participants brought the necessary data — for example, structure and property maps and pressure, volume and temperature analyses.
Recommended Reading
Ryan Lance: ConocoPhillips Wants to ‘Double’ LNG Project Portfolio
2024-09-20 - ConocoPhillips aims to ingrain itself into the global LNG ecosystem, from shale gas output at the wellhead to liquefaction to shipping to regasification in Europe and Asia, CEO Ryan Lance said.
Diversified to Buy East Texas NatGas Assets from Crescent Pass
2024-07-10 - Diversified Energy’s $106 million deal with Crescent Pass Energy comes during a prolonged dip in natural gas prices that some analysts expect to rebound as demand ramps up for LNG exports and power demand.
TotalEnergies Joins Ruwais LNG Project in UAE
2024-07-11 - French energy giant TotalEneriges joined the two-train 9.6 million tonnes per annum Ruwais LNG project in the United Arab Emirates with a 10% interest. The LNG project is expected to start sending out cargos in the second half of 2028.
KKR in Exclusive Talks to Buy Eni's Biofuel Unit for Up to $13.6B
2024-07-23 - KKR enters exclusive talks to buy stake in Eni's biofuel unit although the Italian energy producer said the global investment firm was not the only potential buyer.
Woodside to Emerge as Global LNG Powerhouse After Tellurian Deal
2024-07-24 - Woodside Energy's acquisition of Tellurian Inc., which struggled to push forward Driftwood LNG, could propel the company into a global liquefaction powerhouse and the sixth biggest public player in the world.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.