The split 50-50 Senate passed the 725-page bill on Aug, 7 with Vice President Kamala Harris making the deciding vote that finally passed the sweeping reconciliation bill, omnibus budget legislation that times out at the end of a fiscal year.
It was also the last real opportunity for both parties to posture before the mid-term elections in November.
During the days leading up to the weekend vote, contrarian Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Arizona, re-emerged with threats to thwart her party’s chance to pass landmark legislation—and use it a key campaign fodder in midterm elections.
“Sinema is the greatest source of uncertainty in this process,” said Evercore ISI analyst Tobin Marcus.
The Arizona senator reportedly approached Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, with a handful of asks, including tweaks on depreciation and carried interest. But in the end, it was the one focus that gave other lawmakers the most heartburn that made it into the legislation: a tweak to the minimum corporate tax.
Marcus noted Sinema’s support for the corporate minimum tax in December. By Aug. 7, however, she demanded an exemption for private equity (PE) funds to protect their small and mid-sized portfolio companies from the new corporate minimum tax on billion-dollar corporations.
Private equity has a crucial role in supporting the underinvested and public investor maligned oil and gas sector. A report late last year from the Private Equity Stakeholder Project showed that since 2010, the 10 largest private equity firms had invested $1.1 trillion into the energy industry.
Billions of dollars’ worth of new spending in the bill will be financed largely through new taxes, including the corporate tax that would impose a rate of at least 15% on all firms that generate upward of $1 billion in annual profit.
Sinema argued that without changes to exempt private equity, their small- and mid-sized firms backed by private equity would be made vulnerable; the net effect would violate Democrats’ pledge to raise taxes on large companies.
The tax was not intended to hit the smaller subsidiaries that make up private equity portfolios, said Senate Finance Committee staff.
U.S. tax law treats private equity firms like partnerships, which generally pay taxes based on the returns of their owners. The intended target of the original language was large conglomerate firms, or “C” corporations.
The bill now heads to the Democratic-controlled House, which is expected to take up the legislation on Aug. 12.
Recommended Reading
US Drillers Cut Oil, Gas Rigs for Fifth Week in Six, Baker Hughes Says
2024-09-20 - U.S. energy firms this week resumed cutting the number of oil and natural gas rigs after adding rigs last week.
Western Haynesville Wildcats’ Output Up as Comstock Loosens Chokes
2024-09-19 - Comstock Resources reported this summer that it is gaining a better understanding of the formations’ pressure regime and how best to produce its “Waynesville” wells.
August Well Permits Rebound in August, led by the Permian Basin
2024-09-18 - Analysis by Evercore ISI shows approved well permits in the Permian Basin, Marcellus and Eagle Ford shales and the Bakken were up month-over-month and compared to 2023.
Kolibri Global Drills First Three SCOOP Wells in Tishomingo Field
2024-09-18 - Kolibri Global Energy reported drilling the three wells in an average 14 days, beating its estimated 20-day drilling schedule.
Permian Resources Closes $820MM Bolt-on of Oxy’s Delaware Assets
2024-09-17 - The Permian Resources acquisition includes about 29,500 net acres, 9,900 net royalty acres and average production of 15,000 boe/d from Occidental Petroleum’s assets in Reeves County, Texas.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.