Although this quick look doesn’t tell the whole story, it stands to reason that the market’s attraction to larger E&P companies may lead to additional consolidation in the upstream space. (Source: Hart Energy / Shutterstock.com)
Over the last couple of years at least, we’ve observed a consistent premium awarded to larger upstream companies. Now that many companies have reported their 2020 results, we thought we’d take a fresh look.
Our sample doesn’t include every upstream name, and there are unfortunately quite a few names that we’ve looked at previously that are no longer publicly traded. Some went through bankruptcy and are now private; others merged with another company. Our sample for this review includes 53 companies that have total enterprise value (TEV) between $300 million and $600 billion. For our purposes, we’ve defined “small cap” companies as those with TEV less than $500 million, “mid-cap” up to $10 billion, and “large-cap” as those with greater values.
The chart below compares 2020 EBITDA multiples (TEV/EBITDA) versus TEV; note that the x-axis is a log scale. We continue to see a meaningful relationship between EBITDA multiples and company size. We also note that the EBITDA multiples are higher than we’ve typically seen; we attribute this to low 2020 EBITDA values caused by the pandemic-related collapse in commodity prices. Companies are now valued on a price outlook that’s much better than last year’s outlook.
When we look at the average multiple for our three company sizes (above), the size premium becomes clearer.
Although this quick look doesn’t tell the whole story, it stands to reason that the market’s attraction to larger E&P companies may lead to additional consolidation in the upstream space, particularly where companies scale up from the mid-cap (less than $10 billion) to the large-cap size.
About the Author:
Steve Hendrickson is the president of Ralph E. Davis Associates, an Opportune LLP company. Hendrickson has over 30 years of professional leadership experience in the energy industry with a proven track record of adding value through acquisitions, development and operations. In addition, he possesses extensive knowledge of petroleum economics, energy finance, reserves reporting and data management, and has deep expertise in reservoir engineering, production engineering and technical evaluations. Hendrickson is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and holds an M.S. in Finance from the University of Houston and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. He currently serves as a board member of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and is a registered FINRA representative.
Recommended Reading
Equinor, Ørsted/Eversource Land New York Offshore Wind Awards
2024-02-29 - RWE Renewables and National Grid’s Community Offshore Wind 2 project was waitlisted and may be considered for award and contract negotiations later, NYSERDA says.
First US Utility-scale Offshore Wind Farm Starts Operations
2024-03-14 - The 12-turbine, 130-megawatt South Fork Wind project is a joint venture between Denmark's Orsted and New England-based electric utility Eversource.
Energy Transition in Motion (Week of Feb. 23, 2024)
2024-02-23 - Here is a look at some of this week’s renewable energy news, including approval of the construction and operations plan for Empire Wind offshore New York.
Energy Transition in Motion (Week of March 28, 2024)
2024-03-31 - Here is a look at some of this week’s renewable energy news, including proposals submitted to develop about 6.8 gigawatts of wind projects offshore Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
US Gives Final Green Light to Sunrise Wind Offshore Project
2024-03-26 - The approval by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management solidified Ørsted and Eversource’s commitment to the project with both taking final investment decisions.