Democrats in Congress, accusing oil companies of gouging and profiteering that has raised gasoline prices, on April 28 promised legislation to allow the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general to go after them.
“It would give the FTC and the state AG’s increased authority, including civil penalty authority, to go after oil companies and retailers that are gouging their customers and would cover both wholesale and retail sales,” House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone told reporters.
With opinion polls showing Americans concerned about high prices for energy, food and other consumer goods, Senate Democratic Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said legislation to lower retail gasoline prices “is at the very top of our list.”
House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, also a Democrat, said lowering the price of gasoline at the pump would have the ripple effect of easing rising prices on other goods because of transportation costs.
With congressional elections six months away, Republicans are anchoring their bid to seize majority control of the House and Senate by blaming President Joe Biden and his fellow Democrats in Congress for spending so much money addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and bolstering the economy that it ignited inflation.
Retail gasoline prices in the United States are now around $4.20 per gallon, up from about $2.96 a year ago. The oil industry says price rises are not arbitrary but determined by market forces.
Neither Schumer nor Pelosi would say when such legislation will be voted upon or how much money it could end up saving consumers if enacted into law.
“Big Oil has profiteered and exploited the marketplace,” Pelosi told reporters, citing companies’ strong corporate profits over the past year. “They are hoarding the windfall while keeping prices high at the pump,” she added.
The FTC already has the power to take action against those who manipulate wholesale oil markets by making it illegal to report false information to inflate prices.
Legislation now being drafted by Senate and House committees would double the penalty for manipulating these markets to $2 million per day per violation.
According to a draft of the legislation, the FTC could enforce similar rules in retail markets and include biofuels. It would create a new FTC unit to monitor and analyze the prices of crude oil, gasoline, diesel, home heating oil and others.
The FTC declined to comment on the evolving legislation.
The agency is regularly asked to probe gasoline prices at times when consumers are paying more at the pump and regularly reports that it has found no wrongdoing, said Henry Su, a veteran of the FTC now at the law firm Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP.
Once legislation is sent to the full House and Senate for debate and votes, it is unclear whether Democrats will be able to attract enough Republican support for passage, especially in the Senate where the chamber is divided 50-50 by party and Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris at times casts tie-breaking votes.
Most legislation needs at least 60 votes to clear Senate procedural hurdles, unless Democrats employ a difficult “reconciliation” strategy allowing some measures to pass by simple majority vote.
Noticeably absent from Schumer and Pelosi’s attack on gasoline prices was any effort to suspend the federal gasoline tax or give consumers vouchers to help them pay for the fuel.
As domestic fuel prices have risen, especially after Russia's Feb. 24 assault on Ukraine, Democrats have tried to place the blame on two international actors: Russian President Vladimir Putin for the war that has resulted in supply disruptions and sanctions against Moscow linked to some price increases and an oil industry it accuses of tamping down production while enriching investors through stock buybacks.
On April 28, Schumer called the major oil companies “vultures.”
The oil industry’s American Petroleum Institute on its website ascribes higher prices to a global supply crunch, workforce constraints, instability in Eastern Europe and an economic rebound as the U.S. emerges from the effects of the coronavirus pandemic.
Recommended Reading
Energy Transition in Motion (Week of Sept. 13, 2024)
2024-09-13 - Here is a look at some of this week’s renewable energy news, including an agreement between Exxon Mobil and Mitsubishi Corp. concerning ammonia from a planned hydrogen facility in Texas.
BP Takes FID on Hydrogen Project, Says More to Come
2024-07-30 - BP said it may invest in five to 10 hydrogen projects this decade.
Appalachian Hydrogen Hub Secures Funding, Moves to Phase 1
2024-08-01 - Nearly one dozen projects, including ones by EQT Corp. and CNX Resources, are part of the Battelle-led hub in West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania.
Energy Transition in Motion (Week of Sept. 6, 2024)
2024-09-06 - Here is a look at some of this week’s renewable energy news, including $7.3 billion in clean energy funding for rural Americans.
BP, Repsol-backed Startup Takes Aim at Lower Hydrogen Costs
2024-07-31 - Wisconsin-based Advanced Ionics, backed by BP and Repsol, has developed a new class of electrolyzer that uses process or waste heat already present at industrial facilities to help lower costs and electricity needs.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.