I haven’t seen the movie, “How to Blow Up a Pipeline,” though who can resist a film that one dazzled critic termed “intermittently exciting” and “trite.”
I have, however, read the book by the same name and it rates somewhere between nauseating and terrifying in its self-righteous rationalization of violence in the name of combatting climate change. Wield your mental machete to slash through the author’s intellectual ramblings and you’ll find this simple message at its core: breaking stuff is fun!
Doubt me?
Read how Andreas Malm, the book’s author and professor at Lund University in Sweden, describes his feelings. He and fellow members of the Ende Gelände civil disobedience movement had just torn down fencing surrounding a coal-fired power plant in eastern Germany and stormed the compound.
“I have never felt a greater rush of exhilaration: for one throbbing, mind-expanding moment, we had a slice of the infrastructure wrecking this planet in our hands. We could do with it as we wanted.”
Nope, no sexual innuendo there. Of course, in the next moment, our tree-hugging heroes realized they were clueless about how a power generation facility actually works, much less how to shut one down safely. Eventually, police arrived and the environmental avengers retreated, but not before engaging in sufficient mischief inside the plant that forced its operator to stop generating electricity until repairs could be made.
So, no harm done, except for anybody who may have been hooked up to a ventilator that suddenly lost power. That could have been inconvenient.
“But if destroying fences was an act of violence, it was violence of the sweetest kind,” Malm exudes. “I was high for weeks afterwards.”
Breaking stuff is fun!
Hey, if tearing down fencing were the extent of environmental activism, we could all relax. But it’s not, and it’s the intention of the book to encourage people to act in far more nefarious ways.
“At what point do we escalate?” Malm asks. “When do we conclude that the time has come to also try something different? When do we start physically attacking the things that consume our planet and destroy them with our own hands? Is there a good reason we have waited this long?”
Uh, yeah, there is a good reason, professor. What you are suggesting is illegal and dangerous. People and property—and the environment—can get hurt when energy infrastructure is damaged.
In 1978, a guy named Phillip Martin Olson bombed the then-new Trans Alaska Pipeline, resulting in 14,000 bbl of crude covering four acres of snow before workers could cut the flow.
In 2001, Daniel Carson Lewis shot that same pipeline with a rifle, piercing the pipe near a valve, which caused about 3,600 bbl to spill onto the tundra north of Fairbanks. Lewis did not appear to have any particular motive. He was just “an idiot with a gun, out along the pipeline with alcohol,” said a spokesman for the government agency overseeing pipeline operations.
What is maddening about the book, besides its incoherent writing and mediocre editing, is the smugness. Sneaking through an affluent neighborhood and flattening the tires on SUVs is justified because rich people are capitalists and capitalism is bad. To wit, the drivers of vehicles that emit high levels of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere deserve whatever they’ve got coming.
Also, breaking stuff is fun!
In November 2016, two activists set fire to six pieces of heavy machinery used to build the Dakota Access Pipeline, destroying five of them. A few months later, they used welding torches to burn through the steel of the pipeline. In the next phase, they returned to setting equipment on fire at Energy Transfer work sites with parcels soaked in gasoline.
Either nostalgia won out or activism had drained their creative juices.
The danger of a treatise like this is that somebody will perceive it as reasonable and decide to take action. The dropdown list under “What Could Go Wrong?” is a long one, ranging from a security guard shooting an intruder to a pipeline exploding and killing people who live nearby.
Ironically, this book was published in 2021, as the oil and gas industry engaged in a major push forward to decarbonize. But that wouldn’t matter to Malm or anyone else rationalizing violence in support of the climate. Because breaking stuff is … no, it’s not fun. It’s just irresponsible, dangerous and stupid.
Recommended Reading
Exxon's Joliet Refinery Units Down for a Week, Plans for Restart in Late July, IIR Says
2024-07-17 - A severe storm passed through Joliet earlier this week, leaving thousands without power.
Sempra Infrastructure Contracts with Bechtel for Port Arthur LNG Phase 2
2024-07-22 - Sempra Infrastructure has entered into a fixed-price engineering, procurement and construction contract with Bechtel at Sempra’s Port Aurther LNG Phase 2 project.
Texas Needs More Natgas Pipes as Prices Turn Negative Again
2024-07-31 - Spot gas prices for July 31 at the Waha hub in West Texas turned negative for a third time in July even as a record-breaking heatwave could boost U.S. power demand to an all-time high later this week as homes and businesses crank up their air conditioners.
Despite 2Q Earnings Miss, Kinder Morgan Plans Gas Capacity Growth
2024-07-18 - Kinder Morgan's second quarter earnings fell short of expectations due to recent low gas prices, but remains bullish on natural gas demand and is moving ahead on projects in the Southeast U.S. and Williston Basin.
Segrist: Gassed Up, Waiting to Go: Producers Aim to Remedy Gas Prices
2024-07-31 - The countdown clock for a surge in natural gas demand is ticking. Is the U.S. finally at the turning point?
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.