
Offshore workers require advanced technologies to help their operation be more cost-effective and environmentally sustainable. (Source: Cognite)
Presented by:
Editor's note: This article appears in the E&P newsletter. Subscribe here.
The pressure is mounting on the energy sector to become both more operationally efficient and environmentally sustainable. Investors, policymakers and the broader public are increasingly challenging energy companies to report and share everything when it comes to their emissions, energy use, waste, environmental impact and operational safety. Nowhere is this truer than in the energy industry’s offshore drilling practices, where everything is high stakes: physically complex operations, big price tags for infrastructure, massive environmental footprints and vulnerable public perception.
At the same time, competition and internal politics pose yet another source of pressure to energy companies, which is aimed squarely at how to apply technology to make their most costly area of business—offshore operations—more streamlined and cost efficient. At first glance, it would seem as though companies are forced to pick between these two mounting pressures, and many are choosing technology.
Rise in tech investments
Digital front-runners are scaling up data-driven predictive maintenance and production optimization as well as empowering their offshore workers with technology that assists in everything from visualization to reporting and decision-making. While it’s been varied in terms of speed and dollar values, investment in technology is alive and well in most energy companies. Investment in sustainability is seemingly not following suit. This is surprising considering that there is equivalent pressure from equally important stakeholders.
Sustainability goals unachievable without tech
Paula Doyle, Cognite’s senior vice president of sales and marketing, recently published a piece in which she argued that many of these digital expenditures could be a two-for-one investment, supporting both the business as well as sustainability targets, whether it was intended that way originally or not.
In principle, much of the energy industry agrees with this. The State of the U.S. Energy Industry Report, a large-scale survey conducted in partnership with Harris Poll, Axios Studio and Cognite, found that there is an overall consensus among energy leaders that technology can be the biggest accelerator of sustainability goals. In fact, 84% of energy leaders stated that their sustainability goals would be impossible to achieve without technology.
Businesses, and in particular the energy industry, invest in technology to help efficiency and other operational needs. Digital front-runners in the offshore world are making large technology investments right now. But there is no question that they would have little motive for making such investments if it didn’t help them optimize production, advance workflows, integrate computer vision and other forms of artificial intelligence (AI), and help equip their workforce with the tools necessary to make smarter and safer decisions.
But what’s interesting beyond this, as our own customers’ experiences make clear, is that the technology investments they have made toward productivity or efficiency gains also show sustainability gains.
For instance, one of the largest oil and gas companies in the world has been able to reduce flaring and chemical use through smart tracking and dashboarding, originally meant to prevent plant degradation, help maintenance oversight and save money.
Meanwhile, Framo, a pumping system giant, and Aker BP, an Norwegian oil and gas operator, have worked together to roll out predictive maintenance via contextualized data. Along the way, they found ways to reduce transport-related emissions. And finally, a Norwegian grid operator is using remote and AI-augmented leak detection that also has the side effect of reducing workers’ truck-time emissions.
I do not see it as coincidental that the pressure to transform sustainably and the pressure to transform digitally have been building at roughly the same time. Sustainability and technology should be seen not as two different cost centers but as symbiotic and strategically critical areas. Prioritized investments in both, with true intent to drive both, will help offshore operators design a much more business- and environmentally sustainable future for themselves.
RELATED CONTENT:
Aug. 4, 2021 ESG Reporting and Compliance: It’s Time to Plan Ahead
Aug. 3, 2021 Video: Methane Monitoring: Shutting off the Super-emitters
April 15, 2021 Can the World Reach Net-Zero Emissions by 2050?
March 2, 2021 Video Interview: Building a Case for an ESG Ready Future
Jan. 5, 2021 Q&A: Why ESG Investing Will Impact Oil and Gas in 2021
Register for the upcoming Energy ESG conference here!
Recommended Reading
Devon Energy’s John Krenicki to Retire from Board
2025-03-05 - Krenicki plans to focus on his full-time responsibilities as vice chairman at private equity firm CD&R, Devon Energy said
Chord Announces $750MM Notes Offering to Reduce Debt
2025-03-05 - Chord Energy said it will use part of the funds to reduce its credit facility borrowings. The company is also looking to sell its Marcellus non-operated gas interests.
Phillips 66’s Brouhaha with Activist Investor Elliott Gets Testy
2025-03-05 - Mark E. Lashier, Phillips 66 chairman and CEO, said Elliott Investment Management’s proposals have devolved into a “series of attacks” after the firm proposed seven candidates for the company’s board of directors.
Elliott Nominates 7 Directors for Phillips 66 Board in Big Push for Restructuring
2025-03-04 - Elliott Investment Management, which has taken a $2.5 billion stake in Phillips 66, said the nominated directors will bolster accountability and improve oversight of Phillips’ management initiatives.
Shell Shakes Up Leadership with Upstream and Gas Director to Exit
2025-03-04 - Zoë Yujnovich, Shell’s Integrated Gas and Upstream director, will step down effective March 31.