It is a lot more difficult than one might imagine to determine what noises affect marine mammals. And it might surprise you to find out how much time, effort, money, and creativity are being invested in finding out. Aaron Thode a researcher at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography talked about the work he is doing in marine mammal acoustics at a conference held in Houston October 28-30, 2008. The goal of Thode’s project, funded by the E&P Sound & Marine Life JIP, was to determine if whales identified by towed acoustic arrays were to the left or right of the towing vessel. According to Thode, passive acoustic towed array systems are a popular configuration for current marine mammal mitigation efforts. Typical systems use an array of linearly arranged hydrophones to measure the difference in arrival times of an acoustic pressure wave across the array. This measurement can be converted into a bearing estimate. The problem, Thode explained, is that the phone cannot determine the originating direction of the sound. “Using single linear array, it is impossible to tell if a sound is coming from port or starboard.” Technology for measuring the acoustic particle velocity of a sound wave has existed for 50 years, and directional sensors have been used for 30 years, Thode said, but because the sensors are very sensitive to vibration, traditional sensors are not suitable for towed arrays. Newly introduced technology, however, has eliminated that problem. The new sensor, Thode said, “measures pressure and velocity as well as pitch, roll, and yaw,” enabling it to orient itself to enable accurate readings to determine if marine mammals are to the right or left of the towing vessel. Thode conducted a test of a 1.5-m (5-ft) vector sensor towed array module off the coast of Sitka, AK, in July 2008. That test, Thode said, demonstrated the system’s ability to detect and resolve the bearing of sperm whale sounds. The system also demonstrated what Thode called “an unexpected ability” to eliminate noise contamination from the towing vessel. This project officially concludes in November, 2008, but other similar projects to protect marine life are ongoing, and they are backed by the E&P industry by such companies as Anadarko, BG Group, BHP Billiton, BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Eni, ExxonMobil, IAGC, Santos, Shell, StatoilHydro, Total, and Woodside. When detractors of the oil and gas industry complain that marine life is be threatened or harmed by exploration activity, it might be a good idea to point them in the direction of this JIP.
Recommended Reading
Uncertainty Abounds: IRA Clean Energy Incentives Await Fate
2025-01-05 - Policy experts weigh in on the next possible steps for President Joe Biden’s signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act, following the Trump-led Republican trifecta.
Big Spenders: EPA Touts Billions in Clean Energy Spending
2025-01-15 - Nearly $69 billion in funding from the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law has been dispersed by the Environmental Protection Agency in its clean energy push.
Exxon CEO Darren Woods: Hydrogen Incentives ‘Critical’ for Now
2025-02-03 - Exxon Mobil CEO Darren Woods said the end goal for energy policy should be a system in which no fuel source remains dependent on government subsidies.
Hirs: Expansive Energy Policies Set to Shape 2025 Markets
2025-01-02 - The incoming administration’s policies on sanctions, tariffs, regulations and deportations will impact the oil and gas industry.
Belcher: Trump’s Policies Could Impact Global Energy Markets
2025-01-24 - At their worst, Trump’s new energy policies could restrict the movement of global commerce and at their best increase interest rates and costs.