Everyone is familiar with the recent woes of the U.S. dollar. Currency fluctuation has the potential to cause conflicts in commercial contracts in which sellers have entered into fixed-price contracts with customers. It’s no surprise that the sellers would seek an adjustment to pricing when the currency of the contracts drops, making a sale a losing prospect. However, many buyers obviously, under the circumstances, insist on the price they bargained for.
Some sellers have attempted to use the force majeure provision present in many U.S.-based commercial contracts as their way out of a losing fixed-price arrangement with buyers. The problem, as most of these sellers are quickly discovering, is that U.S. case law almost unanimously rejects the application of force majeure provisions to currency fluctuations.
Typical force majeure provisions cover natural events, such as earthquakes and hurricanes. However, many also contain non-natural events, such as war and strikes, or the inability to secure raw materials at a certain price. In some instances, the non-U.S. seller might argue that a force majeure based on currency fluctuations is a similar non-natural event—not a particularly persuasive argument.
To obtain greater protection against such fluctuations, parties to an international contract should carefully consider the addition of stop-loss provisions that force a renegotiation when currency fluctuates by more than a certain percentage. Parties can also consider the use of an automatic-adjustment provision based on rates published by a third party.
A compromise approach can also include the use of a “collar” that permits currency fluctuations to change within a certain range before a price adjustment is triggered. The key to these provisions is detail and a clear, unambiguous reference to a well-known benchmark.
--Aaron Ball
About the author: Aaron Ball is a Houston-based attorney with Looper, Reed & McGraw and focuses on international transactions and planning for the oilfield and manufacturing industries. He can be reached at aball@lrmlaw.com and at 713-986-7000. And his blog, “Cross-Border Transactions,” is available at http://lrmlawblog.com/international/.
Recommended Reading
E&P Tech Trends: Universal's Cementing Sector is Growing Rapidly - Here's Why [WATCH]
2023-02-28 - In this week's episode of Hart Energy LIVE's E&P Tech Trends, Hart Energy technology reporter Jaxon Caines explores the future of Universal's cementing business with director of cementing Deepak Khatri.
Bakken EOR Trial Increased Output by 25%
2023-01-10 - Liberty Resources' pilot project shows alternating produced gas with water/surfactant EOR mix boosts production and cuts costs in the Bakken Shale.
Keeping Cybersecurity Top of Mind in the Geophysical World
2023-01-19 - IoT enables geophysical workflows but also introduces vulnerability to cyber attacks.
Tieback Bounce-back: Subsea Market on the Rise
2023-02-07 - After an economic downturn and rough period with COVID-19, the market for subsea tiebacks looks to grow stronger than ever.
Raising the Bar for ROV Operator Performance by Lowering the Bar for Entry
2023-01-31 - Technology companies Greensea and Blue Ring’s partnership helps ROV operators become situationally aware without having to “context switch” from task to task.