There's a scene in the latest James Bond movie, "Quantum of Solace," where MI6 director "M," played by Judi Dench, is being chewed out by her superior the Foreign Minister, played by Tim Pigott-Smith. When arguing about doing business in order to gain access to oil reserves, M asks if it's a wise idea to ally with people who operate in unethical ways. The Foreign Minister responds that with the U.S. and China carving up what's left of the world's supplies and Russia not playing ball, "... right and wrong don't come into it, we're acting out of necessity!" That gave me pause. Right and wrong don't come into consideration when you act out of necessity. If that's true, the world is in a lot of trouble. The movie goes on to show a situation where Bolivia is being forced into an artificial drought because of corporate control of water rights, which sadly might have been ripped from the headlines following the real life actions of Bechtel in the company in the 1990s. The company was given private water rights in the country, leading to obscene regulations that could have led to citizens being forced to buy a license from the government in order to collect rainwater. Water is of course a basic human requirement, which makes complete private control of a necessity such as that very questionable. But oil is a bit trickier. Human beings could, and have for thousands of years, lived without oil and gas. But unlike water, it's a non-renewable natural resource. Well, yeah, it is, if you don't mind waiting around for a million years or so. But I digress. My point here is that in order to have access to oil, geopolitics unfortunately requires politicians to have a sort of flexible morality when it comes to from where we import our energy. I would love to tell Hugo Chavez to stick his oil where the sun don't shine, but that's not a realistic move. I would love to tell the Russians to stop playing God with Eastern Europe’s gas supplies, but I lack the abilities to make that so. And let's not even get started on that perfect replica of Medieval village that we like to call the Middle East. Until we find a more viable source of energy, it seems that we're going to have to continue to do business with disreputable business partners. So the James Bond movie got it right: we're acting out of necessity here. –Stephen Payne, Editor, Oil and Gas Investor This Week; www.OilandGasInvestor.com; spayne@hartenergy.com
Recommended Reading
Enverus: 1Q Upstream Deals Hit $51B, but Consolidation is Slowing
2024-04-23 - Oil and gas dealmaking continued at a high clip in the first quarter, especially in the Permian Basin. But a thinning list of potential takeout targets, and an invigorated Federal Trade Commission, are chilling the red-hot M&A market.
Mesa III Reloads in Haynesville with Mineral, Royalty Acquisition
2024-04-03 - After Mesa II sold its Haynesville Shale portfolio to Franco-Nevada for $125 million late last year, Mesa Royalties III is jumping back into Louisiana and East Texas, as well as the Permian Basin.
Mighty Midland Still Beckons Dealmakers
2024-04-05 - The Midland Basin is the center of U.S. oil drilling activity. But only those with the biggest balance sheets can afford to buy in the basin's core, following a historic consolidation trend.
CEO Darren Woods: What’s Driving Permian M&A for Exxon, Other E&Ps
2024-03-18 - Since acquiring XTO for $36 billion in 2010, Exxon Mobil has gotten better at drilling unconventional shale plays. But it needed Pioneer’s high-quality acreage to keep running in the Permian Basin, CEO Darren Woods said at CERAWeek by S&P Global.
Novo II Reloads, Aims for Delaware Deals After $1.5B Exit Last Year
2024-04-24 - After Novo I sold its Delaware Basin position for $1.5 billion last year, Novo Oil & Gas II is reloading with EnCap backing and aiming for more Delaware deals.