HOUSTON—Two U.S. shale producers have challenged an energy pipeline operator's proposed surcharge for the Trump administration's 25% tariff on imported steel, raising the stakes for pipeline builders facing higher construction costs.
The United States imposed tariffs on imported steel and aluminum last year to shield U.S. producers from overseas competition. U.S. energy industry trade groups have warned the tariffs could raise costs for companies and consumers.
U.S. oil producer ConocoPhillips and a unit of Canadian producer Encana Corp. asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to reject Plains All American Pipeline's proposed tariff surcharge on its Cactus II oil pipeline, according to a regulatory filing.
Houston-based Plains this month proposed charging shippers a 5 cents per barrel fee on its 670,000 barrels per day (bbl/d) Cactus II pipeline next April to offset higher construction costs due to the steel tariffs.
"We feel the tariff filing should be denied because it is procedurally incorrect, (and) does not clearly describe or justify the surcharge," ConocoPhillips spokesman Daren Beaudo said in an email.
Encana and Plains did not respond to requests for comment.
In their filing, ConocoPhillips and Encana said Plains' surcharge was premature because the U.S. Commerce Department may still grant the pipeline operator an exemption before the fee goes into effect in April. The companies said surcharges "are generally disfavored" by FERC.
Plains last year estimated the steel tariff would add $40 million to its costs for the $1.1 billion pipeline, which runs 550 miles (885 km) from the Permian basin of West Texas and New Mexico, the top U.S. shale field, to the U.S. Gulf Coast.
Commerce had rejected Plains' two initial requests for a waiver, and the company has filed a third request, a spokesman had said earlier this month.
Plains CEO Willie Chiang said in a conference call the company would rebate the fee to shippers if the Commerce Department approved its exemption request.
Plains' Cactus II pipeline is the first of three new oil pipelines to begin transporting shale oil from the Permian to the U.S. Gulf Coast. The startup has already begun to lift regional oil prices in West Texas that were depressed due to a shortage of capacity.
Two other energy pipeline operators could also raise their prices if Plains' surcharge sticks, analysts have said. They have pointed to Kinder Morgan Inc.’s Gulf Coast Express, a natural gas pipeline, and an EPIC Midstream crude pipeline, which were constructed after the steel tariffs were levied.
Kinder Morgan and EPIC declined to comment.
Recommended Reading
Texas LNG Export Plant Signs Additional Offtake Deal With EQT
2024-04-23 - Glenfarne Group LLC's proposed Texas LNG export plant in Brownsville has signed an additional tolling agreement with EQT Corp. to provide natural gas liquefaction services of an additional 1.5 mtpa over 20 years.
US Refiners to Face Tighter Heavy Spreads this Summer TPH
2024-04-22 - Tudor, Pickering, Holt and Co. (TPH) expects fairly tight heavy crude discounts in the U.S. this summer and beyond owing to lower imports of Canadian, Mexican and Venezuelan crudes.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (April 22, 2024)
2024-04-22 - Stratas Advisors predict that despite geopolitical tensions, the oil supply will not be disrupted, even with the U.S. House of Representatives inserting sanctions on Iran’s oil exports.
Association: Monthly Texas Upstream Jobs Show Most Growth in Decade
2024-04-22 - Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the oil and gas industry has added 39,500 upstream jobs in Texas, with take home pay averaging $124,000 in 2023.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (Feb. 5, 2024)
2024-02-05 - Stratas Advisors says the U.S.’ response (so far) to the recent attack on U.S. troops has been measured without direct confrontation of Iran, which reduces the possibility of oil flows being disrupted.