A U.S. appeals court on Aug. 5 said the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) does not have to be shut and drained per a lower court order, but a legal battle continued over the permit that allowed the line to be finished.
U.S. regulatory officials may still need to issue another environmental assessment for DAPL before deciding if the 570,000-bbl/d oil pipeline can keep operating, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said.
In July, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers violated federal environmental law when it granted an easement to Energy Transfer LP to construct and operate a portion of the pipeline beneath South Dakota's Lake Oahe, a crucial drinking-water source for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe.
That judge said DAPL, controlled by Energy Transfer, would have to shut by Aug. 5. The appeals court decision allows the pipeline to remain running. The appeal will continue but a separate panel of judges will preside over it, lawyers said.
"We will need to run the course with this litigation," Energy Transfer's chief legal counsel Tom Mason said on a company earnings call. "We believe our legal positions are strong, and we are confident that the pipeline will continue to operate."
The district court must make additional findings before the pipeline can be shut, said Earthjustice attorney Jan Hasselman, who represents the Standing Rock Sioux.
"The bottom line is that the fight continues. We're right on the law and we're not giving up until this pipeline is shut down," Hasselman said.
Energy Transfer shares ended up 3.5% to $7.15.
DAPL's construction spurred months-long protests by activists and Native American tribes that culminated in violent clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement. It came into service in mid-2017.
Dakota Access says it could lose billions of dollars if the line was idled for an extended period.
Energy Transfer said it was moving ahead with a plan to expand the pipeline's capacity to as much as 1.1 million bbl/d.
Dakota Access says it could lose billions of dollars if the line, the biggest crude oil pipeline running from North Dakota's shale basin to the Midwest and Gulf Coast refineries, was idled for an extended period.
Recommended Reading
Texas LNG Export Plant Signs Additional Offtake Deal With EQT
2024-04-23 - Glenfarne Group LLC's proposed Texas LNG export plant in Brownsville has signed an additional tolling agreement with EQT Corp. to provide natural gas liquefaction services of an additional 1.5 mtpa over 20 years.
US Refiners to Face Tighter Heavy Spreads this Summer TPH
2024-04-22 - Tudor, Pickering, Holt and Co. (TPH) expects fairly tight heavy crude discounts in the U.S. this summer and beyond owing to lower imports of Canadian, Mexican and Venezuelan crudes.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (April 22, 2024)
2024-04-22 - Stratas Advisors predict that despite geopolitical tensions, the oil supply will not be disrupted, even with the U.S. House of Representatives inserting sanctions on Iran’s oil exports.
Association: Monthly Texas Upstream Jobs Show Most Growth in Decade
2024-04-22 - Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the oil and gas industry has added 39,500 upstream jobs in Texas, with take home pay averaging $124,000 in 2023.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (Feb. 5, 2024)
2024-02-05 - Stratas Advisors says the U.S.’ response (so far) to the recent attack on U.S. troops has been measured without direct confrontation of Iran, which reduces the possibility of oil flows being disrupted.