Russian oil major Rosneft’s $1.4 billion lawsuit against the Exxon Mobil-led Sakhalin-1 consortium relates to a row over how oil should be shared between the Sakhalin-1 concession and an adjacent Rosneft field, court papers show.
Rosneft filed the suit in the Sakhalin district arbitration court in Russia’s Far East, accusing the consortium of unjust enrichment, an allegation the consortium denied. Rosneft did not disclose the exact nature of the dispute.
According to court documents reviewed by Reuters on July 24, the court asked Rosneft to present documents related to an agreement over the “cross-flows” of oil from the Northern Chayvo oil field, controlled by Rosneft.
The Northern Chayvo Field is adjacent to the concession area controlled by the Sakhalin-1 consortium.
It is commonplace in the oil industry for extraction activities on one concession to influence oil flows on a neighboring permit, because the oil lies in rock formations that straddle two or more permits.
“Since oil cross-flows can be determined by an examination, most disagreements between companies of this nature are resolved out of court by negotiation,” Aton, a Russian brokerage, said in a research note.
Asked whether the suit concerned a dispute over “cross-flows” between the Sakhalin and Rosneft permits, a Rosneft spokeswoman said the company had no comment.
Sakhalin-1 is operated by Exxon Neftegaz Ltd., through which Exxon Mobil owns 30% in the project. Rosneft and India's ONGC control 20% each. Japanese consortium Sodeco owns 30%.
Production at Sakhalin-1 stands at about 200,000 barrels per day (bbl/d).
Northern Chayvo was forecast by Rosneft to produce 30,000 bbl/d at its peak when it was launched in September 2014. Rosneft has said the field's production fell by 42% in first-quarter 2018 to about 21,000 bbl/d.
Rosneft’s suit against the Sakhalin-1 project seeks to recover funds gained by parties between July 10, 2015, and May 31, 2018, through “unjust enrichment and interest gained by using other people's money,” according to court documents.
It was not clear from the court documents whether the dispute over “cross-flows” was central to Rosneft’s suit against the Sakhalin consortium, or just part of it.
There is other evidence that the issue has been on Rosneft’s radar.
According to the Russian state procurement database, Rosneft in November 2017 commissioned energy auditing firm DeGolyer and MacNaughton to conduct an audit of “cross-flows” of oil and gas condensate between Northern Chayvo and the oil field developed by the Sakhalin-1 consortium.
Rosneft has confirmed it lodged the suit. Exxon Neftegaz, the Sakhalin-1 operator, said it was “aware of the court action, rejects the claims and will take action to defend the rights of the Sakhalin-1 consortium.”
A Sodeco spokesman declined to comment, saying Exxon is representing the Sakhalin-1 project. ONGC was not immediately available for comment.
Japanese trade and industry minister Hiroshige Seko told a news conference July 24 that his ministry will collect details on the lawsuit and closely look at negotiations between the parties involved.
A ministry official said the lawsuit would not affect Japan’s purchases of Russian oil, which accounted for about 6% of the country’s oil imports in 2017.
High costs, regulatory hurdles and environmentalist opponents have made it difficult to construct major natural gas pipelines out of Appalachia.
George Millas joins EPIC Midstream as chief commercial officer from Energy Transfer, where he was in charge of all the company’s commercial gathering and processing in the Permian Basin.
Industry veteran brings nearly four decades of diverse oil and gas experience to the executive team.