A decision by OPEC and allied countries to cut crude production through March delivered a late Christmas present for U.S. shale firms that have slashed costs, but any rise in prices spurred by the unexpected move may be just a modest stocking stuffer.
U.S. crude oil production has fallen 2 million bbl/d in the last year as low prices and demand forced shale producers to cut their losses. Investors had already been pressuring the industry to curb spending and boost returns before the pandemic hit. Shale output was quickly cut, but might return quickly if prices keep rising.
On Jan. 5, Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, said it would voluntarily reduce its production by 1 million bbl/d in February and March, after Russia pushed to increase output, worried about U.S. shale capitalizing on the group's cuts.
Russia and Kazakhstan will increase their output, reluctant to cede market share to the United States. Overall, OPEC+ had been due to restore 500,000 bbl/d in each of the two months. Saudi officials were concerned new increases would outpace demand during new coronavirus lockdowns.
Prices for WTI on Jan. 8 topped $52/bbl, and the 12-month futures' price, which producers use to plan spending on new wells, hit $51.37/bbl, up from $44.63 at the start of December.
Bottom Lines to Benefit
Higher crude prices will fall directly to U.S. producers' bottom lines given recent cost cuts and commitments to keeping output flat. Companies pledged to keep production flat and use any price increases to boost investor returns or pay down debt.
Rising prices in recent years have "tended to be a bit of a mirage," said Thomas Jorden, CEO of Cimarex Energy Co. "We're going to be highly disciplined in setting a budget," he added at a Goldman Sachs conference on Thursday.
In top two U.S. shale fields, oil and gas companies are profitable in the $30/bbl to low $40s/bbl range, according to data firm Rystad Energy. This year's higher prices could push the shale group's cash from operations up by 32%, Rystad said.
Another factor that will benefit producers is low oilfield service costs. Excess capacity at the companies that provide fracking sand and services cut fees and have not been able to raise them.
"Margins are terrible," said Chris Wright, CEO of Liberty Oilfield Services Inc., the second-biggest fracking company in North America. "They're slightly better now then they were six months ago, but they're still terrible."
Activity Remains Depressed
Liberty has kept existing customers through the pandemic, but pricing remains so low it has not made sense to go after new clients. Demand for fracking services is improving but falls short of levels that would boost U.S. shale production, he said.
Shale producers historically lifted production budgets with rising oil prices, said Linda Htein, senior research manager at consultancy Wood Mackenzie. But "this time is maybe a little bit different" because global demand remains uncertain, she said.
Oil would have to hit $60/bbl to $65/bbl to restore U.S. output by 1 million bbl/d while improving investor returns, said Raoul LeBlanc, a vice president at data provider IHS Markit.
Energy executives in Colorado, Oklahoma, Wyoming and northern New Mexico in a Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City poll released Jan. 8 the said oil prices would have to average $56/bbl for them to substantial increase drilling.
The industry pulled back activity so much last year that oilfield work this year will mean "mitigation of declines rather than growth," said Sarp Ozkan, a senior director at analytics firm Enverus.
Plan would allow Platts to include US crude in its benchmark.
Both Brent and WTI contracts surged more than 4% on March 5 after OPEC and allies, together called OPEC+, extended oil output cuts into April, granting small exemptions to Russia and Kazakhstan.
The market has been expecting the OPEC+ group of producers to ease supply cuts but sources say some key members had suggested that oil output across the OPEC+ group should be kept unchanged.