New York's attorney general sued Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) on Oct. 24, alleging that the world's largest oil company for years misled investors about the risks of climate change regulations on its business.
The suit, filed in New York Supreme Court, New York County, seeks undisclosed damages, a court order for a review of the company's representations, and that the company corrects "numerous misrepresentations" to investors.
It alleges Exxon Mobil assured investors it had properly evaluated the impact of climate regulations on its business using a "proxy cost" for the likely effects of future events on its business. However, these proxy figures frequently were not used in its internal planning or cost assumptions, the suit claims.
The company also failed to properly account for such costs in determining its volume of oil and gas reserves, or whether to write down the value of its assets, a metric important to investors.
"The company claimed to be factoring the risk of increasing climate change regulation into its business decisions," Attorney General Barbara Underwood said in a statement. "Yet as our investigation found, Exxon often did no such thing."
Exxon Mobil "looks forward to refuting these claims as soon as possible and getting this meritless civil lawsuit dismissed," said spokesman Scott Silvestri in a statement.
He further described the suit as the "product of closed-door lobbying by special interests, political opportunism and the attorney general's inability to admit that a three-year investigation has uncovered no wrongdoing."
In the past, Exxon Mobil has called the state's investigation politically motivated and designed to silence it and others in the debate on climate change regulations.
It unsuccessfully fought to halt the New York investigation and a similar probe by the state of Massachusetts that claims Exxon Mobil misled consumers with its statements on climate change.
Exxon and other oil companies including BP Plc (NYSE: BP), Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) and Royal Dutch Shell Plc (NYSE: RDS.A) face lawsuits by cities and counties across the United States seeking funds to pay for seawalls and other infrastructure to guard against rising sea levels brought on by climate change.
OPEC+ Unlikely to Deepen Oil Supply Cuts at June 4 Meeting, Sources Say
2023-06-01 - As the economic outlook worsens, and despite a drop in oil prices, OPEC+ sources suggest deeper oil supply cuts aren't likely.
KAPSARC Says US Shale Continues in Two-Tier System
2023-03-20 - Colin Ward, a fellow with the Riyadh-based King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (KAPSARC), told Hart Energy during CERAWeek by S&P Global that the U.S. shale industry continues to operate in a two-tier system.
Commentary: What’s Really Behind OPEC’s Sudden Oil Cut?
2023-04-14 - Federal policies that have hampered the U.S. oil and gas industry have also put OPEC+ in the driver’s seat with the ability to control and drive oil prices — at exactly the wrong time.
US Reduces Flaring and Flaring Intensity, The World Bank Says
2023-04-12 - The U.S. continued to make steady progress to reduce its gas flaring in 2022 and achieved a 9% reduction compared to 2021, The World Bank announced in a recent report on flaring.
Energy Security a Top Priority Due to the Russia-Ukraine War, Eurasia Exec Says
2023-04-26 - Eurasia Group’s Raad Alkadiri believes the Russia-Ukraine war is a ‘watershed’ event causing a number of issues to spill from it, especially in terms of energy security, and will shape the energy sector going forward.