Toby Rice speaking at Hart Energy’s DUG East conference in 2016. At the time, he served as president and COO of Rice Energy. (Source: Hart Energy)
[Editor's note: This story was updated at 3:58 p.m. CDT April 25.]
The brothers behind Rice Energy filed a lawsuit on April 25 against EQT Corp., the company which acquired Rice in a multibillion-dollar shale merger over two years ago, as the dispute between the two groups continues.
The lawsuit, filed by Toby Rice on behalf of the Rice team, claims EQT and its board of directors are manipulating the company’s upcoming shareholder election to thwart the proxy campaign launched by the Rice team earlier this year.
UPDATE - Rice Energy Founder To Drop Lawsuit Against EQT
Rice brothers, Daniel, Toby and Derek, started Rice Energy while still in their mid-20s and quickly grew the company from a family-owned operation into a billion-dollar enterprise in the span of a decade. The brothers eventually sold Rice Energy and its roughly 250,000 net-acre position in the core of the Marcellus and Utica to EQT for $8.2 billion in what was the most expensive U.S. shale merger of 2017.
Following close of the transaction in late 2017, the brothers went on to form a multi-strategy fund named Rice Investment Group. However, the brothers have still keenly watched the progress from the EQT-Rice combination, in part because their fortunes are tied to EQT’s performance as the 2017 merger included a payment of $1.3 billion in cash plus $5.4 billion in EQT equity.
Since December 2018, Toby and Derek have voiced concerns over EQT management and operational efficiencies. The brothers have also said that they disagree with the company’s approach so far and on March 21 revealed their director nominations for the Appalachia shale gas giant’s board.
Daniel Rice has so far excluded himself from the quarrel as he currently sits on the EQT board, which he joined following the close of the merger.
RELATED: Things Get ‘Awkward’ For Rice Brothers Thanks To EQT Feud
The lawsuit filed against EQT and its board on April 25 alleges EQT is attempting to create an uneven playing field by requiring, as a condition of the submission of nominations, that the Rice team’s nominees consent to being named in EQT’s proxy materials.
The Rice team believes that there is no such requirement in EQT’s bylaws and that any such requirement would violate Pennsylvania law. Further, Rice called the move a coercive tactic by EQT designed to preserve the incumbent directors’ majority control of EQT by creating the deceptive appearance that the Rice team’s nominees support the incumbents.
Instead, the Rice team believes EQT should either follow the practice of each side’s nominees appearing on separate proxy cards, or it should consent to the use of a universal proxy card, with all nominees appearing on the same card.
“We believe both sides agreeing to use a universal proxy card would reflect best-in-class corporate governance, as the most qualified directors would be elected regardless of which proxy card a shareholder voted on,” Toby Rice said in a statement on April 25.
The Rice team slate consists of nine independent nominees and includes both Daniel and Toby Rice.
In an interview with Reuters, EQT CEO Rob McNally insisted there was no attempt by the board of the company to manipulate the nomination process, and said it would file its preliminary proxy material in the “next few weeks.”
McNally told Reuters the Rice lawsuit was timed to distract the market from EQT’s first-quarter earnings released earlier April 25, which he described as “a good set of results from the company.”
Over the last two quarters, EQT said in a company statement on April 25 it has generated more than $300 million in adjusted free cash flow.
“The company’s outstanding financial and operational performance demonstrates that it is on track to achieve the ambitious free cash flow targets set out in January. ... Management continues to be laser-focused on turning EQT into a free cash flow machine,” the company statement said.
The election for the EQT board of directors will take place at the company’s annual meeting on July 10. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC is financial adviser to EQT and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is serving as its legal counsel.
Emily Patsy can be reached at epatsy@hartenergy.com.
Recommended Reading
CEO: Linde Not Affected by Latest US Green Subsidies Package Updates
2024-02-07 - Linde CEO Sanjiv Lamba on Feb. 6 said recent updates to U.S. Inflation Reduction Act subsidies for clean energy projects will not affect the company's current projects in the United States.
Global Energy Watch: Corpus Christi Earns Designation as America's Top Energy Port
2024-02-06 - The Port of Corpus Christi began operations in 1926. Strategically located near major Texas oil and gas production, the port is now the U.S.’ largest energy export gateway, with the Permian Basin in particular a key beneficiary.
The Problem with the Pause: US LNG Trade Gets Political
2024-02-13 - Industry leaders worry that the DOE’s suspension of approvals for LNG projects will persuade global customers to seek other suppliers, wreaking havoc on energy security.
BWX Technologies Awarded $45B Contract to Manage Radioactive Cleanup
2024-03-05 - The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management awarded nuclear technologies company BWX Technologies Inc. a contract worth up to $45 billion for environmental management at the Hanford Site.
Belcher: Our Leaders Should Embrace, Not Vilify, Certified Natural Gas
2024-03-18 - Recognition gained through gas certification verified by third-party auditors has led natural gas producers and midstream companies to voluntarily comply and often exceed compliance with regulatory requirements, including the EPA methane rule.