Activist investor Elliott Investment Management should back down from its push to break up energy company Phillips 66 because it is conflicted from a separate effort to acquire one of the group's rivals, Phillips 66 said in a letter on April 21.
The salvo is the latest in a bitter spat between Phillips 66 and Elliott that is due to come to a head at a shareholder meeting next month.
In arguing against Elliott's break-up thesis in the letter, Phillips 66 said the investment firm has a conflict of interest due to its separate efforts to buy Citgo Petroleum.
Citgo's parent company is being sold via a court-supervised auction. Last year, Elliott-backed Amber Energy was initially deemed the winner of the process, before creditor challenges forced the court to backtrack and launch a new sale.
Amber Energy CEO Gregory Goff said on April 9 he had bought a position in Phillips 66 and backed Elliott's campaign.
"This conflict is concerning because Amber Energy's executives are actively helping support Elliott's case to undermine Phillips 66's strategy," said the April 21 letter from Phillips 66.
Phillips 66 is one of the largest U.S. refiners, while Citgo is the seventh largest.
In response to a request for comment, an Elliott spokesperson pointed to an April 10 regulatory filing.
This stated that Goff's work alongside Elliott was "hidden from no one, and in no way represents a conflict of interest, diminishes the independence of his views or impairs his ability to help Phillips 66 become a stronger, more valuable company".
Elliott has put forward four director nominees for the May 21 meeting as part of a campaign that has also included calling on Phillips 66 to sell or spin off its midstream business and consider divesting other assets to focus on its refining business and boost its share price.
Elliott has said it has a more than $2.5 billion investment in Phillips 66. It is the second time the investment firm has pushed for change at Phillips 66, after a first effort ended in early 2024 with the addition of a new company board member blessed by Elliott.
Recommended Reading
In Colorado, the Regulatory Noose Tightens for E&Ps
2025-03-25 - More stringent rules on everything from drilling and orphan wells to emissions is raising the cost of fossil fuel production in the state.
Impacts of Trump’s Tariffs on North American Energy Markets
2025-03-06 - On March 6, President Trump granted exemptions on tariffs for numerous goods imported from Mexico and Canada until April 2, when Trump intends to impose another set of retaliatory tariffs on various countries. What are their immediate and long-term impacts and how can companies mitigate their effects?
The Evolving Federal State of Energy Under Trump 2.0
2025-03-04 - What happens when the Trump wrecking ball swings into the bureaucratic web of everything that touches oil and gas?
Trade War! Or Maybe Not
2025-03-06 - An energy industry that prefers stability gets hit with whiplash as it attempts to adjust to the Great Disruptor taking over the White House.
Exclusive: Sheffield Says FTC Could Rescind His, John Hess’ Bans
2025-03-11 - Former Pioneer Natural Resources CEO Scott Sheffield told Hart Energy that his ban by the Federal Trade Commission from serving on Exxon Mobil’s board "was pretty much illegal. It's a baseless and illegal order that was done.”
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.