Learn more about Hart Energy Conferences
Get our latest conference schedules, updates and insights straight to your inbox.
The last time I travelled to Houston, one item alone was top of the agenda for oil companies: climate.
From sit downs with executives and onstage panels, to conversations in hallways and evening drinks, the industry’s role in tackling emissions (or lack thereof) was the dominant theme the World Petroleum Congress three months ago.
But as Granholm’s recent comments make clear, the narrative has shifted. The war in Ukraine and the soaring prices it has triggered mean energy security has bumped climate down the agenda.
Still, executives are keen to burnish their environmental credentials to investors and to press politicians for a seat at the table when it comes to tackling emissions.
Darren Woods, CEO of Exxon Mobil, said the industry faced “two vitally important challenges: meeting the world’s energy needs and addressing climate change”—and should be given a role in deciding the approach to tackling both:
“With the challenge that we have with respect to managing climate change, I think the call is even greater for industry and governments to collaborate to make sure that the policy is being put in place and the direction that we’re going is thoughtful and balanced.”
Ryan Lance, ConocoPhillips CEO, was among many big names pushing for a carbon tax to shift the burden down the chain to consumers.
“We think the best way to impact the demand side of the equation is to make consumers understand the choices that they’re making.”
Lance also attacked the idea that oil producers should be responsible for so-called scope 3 emissions, those from the burning of their products.
“We think it’s irrational to hold our company or companies in our industry responsible for scope 3 emissions. Those are consumer-led choices that are in the consumers making those decisions.”
But it was Tengku Muhammad Taufik, CEO of Malaysian state-owned Petronas, who put the industry’s position most succinctly: “We are not the villains in this piece,” he said. “We’re part of the solution.”
This article is an excerpt of Energy Source, a twice-weekly energy newsletter from the Financial Times.
Recommended Reading
DUG GAS+: Chesapeake in Drill-but-don’t-turn-on Mode
2024-03-28 - COO Josh Viets said Chesapeake is cutting costs and ready to take advantage once gas prices rebound.
CERAWeek: Trinidad Energy Minister on LNG Restructuring, Venezuelan Gas Supply
2024-03-28 - Stuart Young, Trinidad and Tobago’s Minister of Energy, discussed with Hart Energy at CERAWeek by S&P Global, the restructuring of Atlantic LNG, the geopolitical noise around inking deals with U.S.-sanctioned Venezuela and plans to source gas from Venezuela and Suriname.
Exclusive: Chevron Balancing Low Carbon Intensity, Global Oil, Gas Needs
2024-03-28 - Colin Parfitt, president of midstream at Chevron, discusses how the company continues to grow its traditional oil and gas business while focusing on growing its new energies production, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Baltimore Port Closure Could Dent US Coal Export Volumes, EIA Says
2024-03-28 - Baltimore handled exports of 28 million short tons last year, making up 28% of total U.S. coal exports.
Vopak Consortium Selected to Operate New LNG Terminal in South Africa
2024-01-10 - Vopak, in a partnership with Transnet Pipelines, was selected to develop and operate an LNG terminal at the Port of Richards Bay in South Africa for 25 years.