This is an excerpt from the Ralph E. Davis Associates (RED) Weekly E&P Update Newsletter.

Over the last several months (and right up to today) some of the headlines we’ve highlighted in our “Selected Industry Headlines” have addressed the slower-than-expected response of operators to increase drilling activity as oil prices have risen. This appears to be consistent with the expectations of their equity investors and the realities of the tougher underwriting standards in the debt markets. Let’s look back at recent oil prices spikes to compare the current rig count response to earlier ones.

The graph below shows the average monthly WTI spot price and the average monthly North American oil-directed rig count from August 1987 to January 2022. The data is from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and Baker Hughes, and the rig count has been shifted backward five months to account for the typical lag in the rig count response.

Ralph E Davis Weekly - North American Oil Rig Count and WTI Spot Price Graph
(Source: Ralph E. Davis Associates, EIA, Baker Hughes)

I’ve highlighted a few areas of the history.

  1. This was the period before unconventional oil production had taken off. New oil developments in the U.S. were typically offshore, many in the deep water. These projects have long lead times and require an expectation that prices will remain high for a significant period. As a result, the big increase in oil prices from 2004-2007 didn’t result in much of an increase in the rig count. It probably resulted in a material increase in capital spending, however, since deepwater exploration and development is so expensive.
  2. This is the first price spike during what I’ve called the “unconventional dominant” period, and the rig activity response is exactly what we would expect. Since the nature of unconventional drilling allows for rapid development and the time to get wells on production is short, operators responded to capitalize on higher near-term prices. The resulting increase in production led to oversupply (which OPEC+ was unwilling to underwrite), so prices dropped, and the rig count quickly followed, which set the stage for the next cycle.
  3. As prices moved back to the $50-$60/bbl range, the rig count again responded rapidly and significantly until the pandemic depressed demand. This led to lower prices, and once again, the rig count quickly fell.
  4. The muted response in this period is evident. During the previous two cycles, oil prices above $80/bbl resulted in oil-directed rig counts of around 1,000 rigs, but right now we’re only at around 500.

Oil prices at the current level are something of an outlier and it seems reasonable to expect a supply response The big question is: who will make it? OPEC+ or U.S. operators? As discussed in some of the highlighted articles, investor expectations are only part of the reason for the slow response. U.S. labor markets are tight, many workers are wary of returning to the upstream business after the last downturn, and even frac sand is in tight supply. My expectation is that the U.S. oil and gas industry will respond, but more slowly than in the past, until capital and other constraints are resolved.

About the Author:

Steve Hendrickson is the president of Ralph E. Davis Associates, an Opportune LLP company. Hendrickson has over 30 years of professional leadership experience in the energy industry with a proven track record of adding value through acquisitions, development and operations. In addition, he possesses extensive knowledge of petroleum economics, energy finance, reserves reporting and data management, and has deep expertise in reservoir engineering, production engineering and technical evaluations. Hendrickson is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and holds an M.S. in Finance from the University of Houston and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. He recently served as a board member of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and is a registered FINRA representative.