It would take an estimated 280-rig increase to turbocharge U.S. shale production within a short window of time, according to Stratas Advisors’ Stephen Beck. (Source: Hart Energy/Shutterstock.com)
[Editor's note: This story originally appeared in the January 2020 edition of E&P. Subscribe to the magazine here.]
Modern-day history is chock full of “where were you when ‘xyz’ event happened?” moments. Most people of a certain age vividly remember what they were doing on Nov. 22, 1963, when they learned the news of the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy.
Even more remember hearing the news of American Airlines Flight 11’s crash into the North Tower of the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, and the following realization that it was not accidental as three more planes crashed into infamy.
These events shape our response to future tragedies. Take, for example, the drone attack on the two Saudi Aramco refineries at Abqaiq and Khurais. It rekindled memories of Kuwait, Desert Storm and my first taste of the fear that surrounds possible oil supply disruptions. I was a teenager itching to get my first car and driver’s license at the time.
The meteoric rise of unconventional oil and gas development answered the collective call to lessen U.S. dependence on foreign oil. However, the drone attacks—even though I know the U.S. is producing 12-plus MMbbl/d of crude oil—brought forward the spectre of a supply disruption.
It was with curious ears that I listened to Stratas Advisors’ Stephen Beck at the recent DUG Midcontinent Conference give his answer to the million-barrel question. Can U.S. shale hit the gas on crude production at a moment’s notice? What would it take to deliver an additional 1 MMbbl/d of oil?
According to Beck, it would take an estimated 280-rig increase to turbocharge shale production within a short window of time.
It would require a coordinated, multilayered effort. In his estimate, to increase production by another million barrels within a six-month time frame, it would require 420 additional wells added above plan each month with 2,100 truckload movements per month just to move those rigs. It would require 15,960 additional stages completed each month, with 93 completion spreads added to service, more than 6 Blb of additional proppant and more than 7 Bgal of additional water.
It would require a tremendous amount of steel, supplies and sweat to make it happen. As Beck noted, it would be a daunting task, but we’ve done it before, so why not again?
Helping in this daunting quest will be people like this year’s Energy Innovators. E&P is honored to recognize these men and women for their leadership and contributions in advancing oil- and gas-related technologies. Visit hartenergy.com/energy-
Read E&P's accompanying 2020 Energy Innovators articles:
Recommended Reading
Kissler: Gas Producers Should Still Hedge on Price
2025-03-27 - Recent price jumps and rising demand don’t negate the need to protect against future drops.
Plains All American President Pefanis to Retire
2025-03-27 - Current CEO Willie Chiang will take over as the next president of Plains All American Pipeline following co-founder Harry Pefanis’ retirement.
Japan’s JAPEX Backs Former TreadStone Execs’ New E&P Peoria
2025-03-26 - Japanese firm JAPEX U.S. Corp. made an equity investment in Peoria Resources, led by former executives from TreadStone Energy Partners.
CPP Wants to Invest Another $12.5B into Oil, Gas
2025-03-26 - The Canada Pension Plan’s CPP Investments is looking for more oil and gas stories—in addition to renewable and other energies.
Shell Raises Shareholder Distributions and LNG Sales Target, Trims Spending
2025-03-25 - Shell trimmed its annual investment budget to a $20 billion to $22 billion range through 2028 after spending $21.1 billion last year.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.