A Sempra subsidiary has completed the sale of a 42%, non-controlling interest in the Port Arthur LNG Phase 1 to KKR, making the private-equity firm the largest stakeholder in the project.
The $13 billion project on the Texas Gulf Coast reached final investment decision (FID) in March. At the time, Sempra announced it would sell a stake in the facility to New York-based KKR. At the time of the announcement, KKR’s possible stake was still undecided and ranged between 25% and 39%. The price paid by KKR for the stake was not disclosed in a Sept. 12 new release.
The transaction will not alter subsidiary Sempra Infrastructure from retaining a controlling 28% indirect interest in Phase 1 at the project level. The remaining 30% interest is owned by ConocoPhillips.
RELATED
Sempra Reaches FID on $13 Billion Port Arthur LNG Project, Closes JV
“The closing of this transaction continues the positive momentum of our world-class Port Arthur LNG facility and highlights Sempra Infrastructure’s ability to access capital to support the growth of its infrastructure business,” said Justin Bird, CEO of Sempra Infrastructure. “We remain committed to developing energy infrastructure projects with strong partners to continue growing our portfolio while advancing global decarbonization and energy security.”
Port Arthur LNG Phase 1 has moved along with strong momentum and is on track to meet its objectives of “helping to deliver energy security, economic growth and a near-term supply of reliable and cleaner energy,” said James Cunningham, partner at KKR.
More than 2.8 million hours of work have been completed since construction began on the LNG facility this spring and Sempra reported no lost-time incidents.
The expected commercial operation date for Train 1 is 2027, with Train 2 coming online in 2028.
KKR’s involvement drew criticism from the Private Equity Stakeholder Project.
“KKR’s messaging on the climate risks of their investments is not consistent with their actual investment actions,” said Nichole Heil, research and campaign coordinator at the project. “Even with KKR’s showcased renewable energy initiatives, 78% of the company’s energy portfolio remains centered on fossil fuels. And with almost half of Port Arthur equity being owned by KKR, the firm is culpable for the community and climate harms the project produces.”
Heil added that the Port Arthur terminal will increase the toxic pollutant exposure for a “predominantly Black and Latino coastal town.”
Recommended Reading
Kissler: Wildcards That Could Impact Oil, Gas Prices in 2025
2024-11-26 - Geopolitics and weather top the list of trends that will determine the direction of oil and gas.
Adkins: The Overhang of Excess Oil May Not Be All that Massive
2024-12-02 - Raymond James’ J. Marshall Adkins says the market is factoring in perceptions of OPEC excess capacity from countries such as Venezuela, Nigeria and Iraq that have yet to hit their production potential—and probably won't anytime soon.
Paisie: Trump’s Impact on All Things Energy
2024-12-11 - President-elect Donald Trump’s policies are expected to benefit the U.S. oil and gas sector, but also bring economic and geopolitical risks.
EPA Gives OK to Texas GulfLink Deepwater Port
2024-11-04 - Sentinel Midstream’s Texas GulfLink project is one of several proposals for an offshore oil terminal in the Gulf.
Enverus: Haynesville Has 12.5 Years of Sub-$3 NatGas Inventory
2024-11-19 - Enverus forecasts that the time left to capitalize on the Haynesville's inventory will shorten by another two years when taking into account a boom in LNG demand.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.