Greenpeace and other environmental campaigners have launched legal challenges against the European Commission over its decision to include natural gas and nuclear energy in the EU’s list of “green” investments.
They argue the EU violated its own climate laws by doing this, citing the greenhouse-gas emissions produced by gas power plants, and say the move risks diverting investments into fossil fuels instead of renewable energy.
Greenpeace said it had requested an internal review of the Commission’s decision to label gas and nuclear energy as green. Four other environmental groups—WWF, Friends of the Earth Germany, Transport & Environment and ClientEarth—focused on gas.
The Commission said it would reply to the requests in due course.
In focus is the EU’s ‘taxonomy,’ a rulebook defining which investments can be labeled climate-friendly and designed to guide investors towards green projects that will help deliver the bloc’s emissions-cutting targets.
The Commission has until February to respond. If the Commission does not withdraw the rules, the groups said they would take their challenges to the European Court of Justice.
“Gas is a leading cause of climate and economic chaos, while there is still no solution to the problem of nuclear radioactive waste and the risk of nuclear accidents is far too significant to ignore,” Greenpeace campaigner Ariadna Rodrigo said.
The Commission had excluded gas power plants from its original taxonomy proposal, but added them later, amid a fierce political debate among EU countries—who disagree on whether the fuel deserves a 'green' label.
Brussels said it had added “strict conditions” to the final rules for gas plants, including an emissions limit and a requirement to switch to low-carbon gases by 2035.
Representatives from five non-profit groups quit their roles advising the Commission on the taxonomy last week, citing the EU’s handling of the gas and nuclear rules.
Separately, Luxembourg and Austria, which both oppose nuclear power and have warned against labelling gas as green, are preparing a legal challenge to the EU rules.
Recommended Reading
Midstream M&A Adjusts After E&Ps’ Rampant Permian Consolidation
2024-10-18 - Scott Brown, CEO of the Midland Basin’s Canes Midstream, said he believes the Permian Basin still has plenty of runway for growth and development.
Post Oak-backed Quantent Closes Haynesville Deal in North Louisiana
2024-09-09 - Quantent Energy Partners’ initial Haynesville Shale acquisition comes as Post Oak Energy Capital closes an equity commitment for the E&P.
Analyst: Is Jerry Jones Making a Run to Take Comstock Private?
2024-09-20 - After buying more than 13.4 million Comstock shares in August, analysts wonder if Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones might split the tackles and run downhill toward a go-private buyout of the Haynesville Shale gas producer.
Aethon, Murphy Refinance Debt as Fed Slashes Interest Rates
2024-09-20 - The E&Ps expect to issue new notes toward redeeming a combined $1.6 billion of existing debt, while the debt-pricing guide—the Fed funds rate—was cut on Sept. 18 from 5.5% to 5%.
Dividends Declared Sept.16 through Sept. 26
2024-09-27 - Here is a compilation of dividends declared from select upstream, midstream and service and supply companies.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.