
The U.S. Department of Interior approved reduced amounts of surface infrastructure for the Alaska Willow project. (Source: Shutterstock)
President Joe Biden’s administration approved on March 13 ConocoPhillips’ Willow project on Alaska’s North Slope — a downsized version of the E&P’s multi-billion project that illustrates the growing focus governments worldwide are placing on energy security.
The approval comes from an administration that imposed moratoriums on oil and gas drilling on federal lands, only to see the price of oil and gas skyrocket. The subsequent invasion of Ukraine by Russia has altered the thinking of leads of many nation states as they look to secure energy supplies.
The approval comes after years of delays. The Willow Project began planning in earnest in 2018. But the company’s designs on the project have spanned five presidential administrations. The resulting decision released on March 13 by the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) pares down the company’s requests, but undoubtedly represents a win for oil and gas producers.
The DOI’s final approval substantially reduces the amount of surface infrastructure, including gravel roads, ice roads and pipelines and gives ConocoPhillips “the least amount of project and inject wells” at 199 approved, compared to a previous request for 251 well sites. Two of the five drill sites proposed by ConocoPhillips’ were not approved.
In a press release, DOI said the company will also relinquish rights to approximately 68,000 acres of its existing leases in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A), including approximately 60,000 acres in the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area.
ConocoPhillips relinquishment of 68,000 acres of its northernmost and southernmost leases within the Bear Tooth Unit also reduces its footprint there by one-third.

“This reduces the project’s freshwater use and eliminates all infrastructure related to the two rejected drill sites, including approximately 11 miles of roads, 20 miles of pipelines and 133 acres of gravel, all of which reduces potential impacts to caribou migration and subsistence users,” the DOI said.
The Willow project represents a massive $8 billion investment by ConocoPhillips and, the company said, the largest project in size and scale to be developed on the North Slope in more than 120 years. The project would also create roughly 2,500 construction jobs and about 300 long-term jobs.
ConocoPhillips has offered various estimates for the project’s oil production. The company’s website said Willow would produce, at its peak, 180,000 bbl/d of oil.
In November, ConocoPhillips Chairman and CEO Ryan Lance told Hart Energy that Willow is “potentially a several-hundred-million-barrel resource. The peak rate would be 160,000 bbl/d.” ConocoPhillips has said cumulative barrels of recoverable oil at about 600 MMbbl.
“This was the right decision for Alaska and our nation,” Lance said in a March 13 news release. “Willow fits within the Biden Administration’s priorities on environmental and social justice, facilitating the energy transition and enhancing our energy security, all while creating good union jobs and providing benefits to Alaska Native communities.”
Lance noted that the project had pass through five years of “rigorous regulatory and environmental review,” and that Willow is designed to support and coexist with subsistence activities with many mitigation measures built into the project design.
The project will also be a boon for the taxman. The DOI’s Bureau of Land Management estimated Willow could generate between $8 billion and $17 billion in levies for federal, state and local governments.

Despite the smaller scale of the project, environmental groups were angered by decision.
The Alaska Wilderness League expressed “deep disappointment” with President Biden’s decision to greenlight the project and called it a defining decision for his administration’s climate legacy.
In a press release, Kristen Miller, executive director of the group, said the decision was wrong for the climate and projecting biodiversity.
“The Willow project is designed to open the door to the development of billions of barrels of oil over decades,” she said. “Let’s be clear: rampant oil and gas development on our nation’s public lands must stop now. We will keep fighting the Willow project and future projects like it. And we call on the administration to change the way we manage all our nation’s public lands for climate, starting with America’s Arctic.”
DOI’s announcement came as President Biden said he would take action to designate approximately 2.8 million acres in the Arctic Ocean nearshore the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska as indefinitely off limits for future oil and gas leasing.
Recommended Reading
Canadian Gas Producers to Boost Unconventional Production, Capex
2023-01-18 - Wood Mackenzie expects Canada’s largest natural gas producers — Montney Shale producers Tourmaline Oil, Canadian Natural Resources (CNRL) and ARC Resources — to continue to grow their unconventional production in 2023 despite inflation pressures.
Canada’s Imperial Oil Reports Record Operational, Financial Performance
2023-02-02 - Imperial reported solid financial fourth quarter results and introduced a new goal to achieve net-zero by 2050.
Q&A: Ecopetrol’s Felipe Bayon Talks About the Permian, Colombian Gas
2023-03-10 - Felipe Bayon, the CEO of Colombia’s state-owned Ecopetrol, spoke with Hart Energy at CERAWeek by S&P Global to discuss advances in the Permian Basin with Occidental Petroleum and progress offshore Colombia with Petrobras and Shell Colombia, while touting Colombia’s offshore gas potential.
Top Oil, Gas CEOs: Playing the Long Game When the Rules Keep Changing
2023-03-09 - U.S., Australian and Japanese oil and gas CEOs want regulatory certainty that lasts “beyond one election cycle," they said during a panel discussion at CERAWeek.
Exclusive Q&A: Attracting the 'Best and Brightest' to the Energy Industry [WATCH]
2023-01-27 - Stephanie Hertzog, CEO of energy and resources North America at Sodexo, believes that while the push for renewable energy will persist over the coming years, the need for fossil fuels will continue driving the shale industry.