Estonia still aimed to phase out shale-oil plants by 2035 and end shale oil production by 2040, said Jaanus Uiga at Estonia's Economic Affairs and Communications Ministry. (Source: Shutterstock.com)
When Baltic states switched off Russian power and halted other imports in response to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, Estonia restarted its shale oil power plants and set back its efforts to phase out heavily polluting fuels.
It mirrors actions across the EU as governments wean themselves off Russian gas, which once supplied the bloc with about 40% of its needs, and race to find other gas suppliers or alternative fuels as a stopgap for winter.
“It is an insurance ticket for Estonia because the oil shale is there,” said Hando Sutter, CEO of Estonian state-run energy group Eesti Energia. “This is just to replace the missing power supplies and compensate for high power prices.”
He said Finland and the Baltic states of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia lost Russian power imports of about 2.5 gigawatt hours, which needed to be replaced to keep the lights on.
Generating a megawatt hour (MWh) of electricity from shale oil emits about a tonne of CO₂, roughly the same as coal, based on comparing figures issued by Estonia's economy ministry and the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
“This is just to replace the missing power supplies and compensate for high power prices,” Stutter said of the shift back to shale oil. “We are not motivated to continue, and we want to stop it as soon as it is possible.”
Electricity prices in the three Baltic nations, previously major importers of Russian power, have shot up, spiking to 4,000 euros ($3,908) per MWh in August, the upper limit allowed at the stock exchange. Inflation has hit about 20% in the three states.
Estonian power plants in 2020 had a capacity of 3 gigawatts, the regulator said, of which 2 gigawatts was from plants that burn locally produced shale oil and which are being phased out.
Estonia still aimed to phase out shale-oil plants by 2035 and end shale oil production by 2040, said Jaanus Uiga at Estonia's Economic Affairs and Communications Ministry.
“It’s not good for the environment, but in these unprecedented circumstances, we really need to use every solution to save to save gas and reduce our dependency from imported Russian fossil fuels,” he said.
About 80% of cost of power from the power plants are environmental taxes. Eesti Energia said it had hired 600 people this year to ramp up shale oil production and to staff the power plants.
($1 = 1.0236 euros)
Recommended Reading
Q&A: Dan Pickering Talks M&A, US Production Growth and the Energy Transition
2023-01-27 - Dan Pickering, Chief Investment Officer of Pickering Energy Partners (PEP), discusses U.S. production and M&A after a “funky and weird” 2022 and sees the U.S. shale boom settling into a “shale business.”
Hess CEO Says OPEC ‘Back in the Driver’s Seat’ as US Shale Slows
2022-11-17 - OPEC’s agreed oil output cut in October was as much a political jab at U.S. President Joe Biden, who was trying to lower gasoline prices, as it was an economic move, Hess Corp. CEO John Hess on Nov. 17.
OPEC's US Shale Worries Subside as it Cuts Forecast
2022-12-16 - OPEC kept its 2022 U.S. shale oil supply predictions at 590,000 bbl/d after cutting it steadily since July's original forecast of 880,000 bbl/d.
Argentina Pumps Record Shale Oil as Vaca Muerta Takes Off
2023-01-25 - As one of Latin America's mid-range oil producers, Argentina has pledged to reverse 2022's $5 billion energy deficit to a surplus of around $12 billion by 2025.
Earthquake Impact Adds to Some Texas Oil Producers' Costs
2022-12-19 - "Absolute shut-in of deep wells in the area would cause a significant logistics issue to maintain oil and gas production in highly productive fields in New Mexico and West Texas," CAP Resources' Laura Capper said.