
The judge ruled for Williams’ proposed seven crossings of Energy Transfer’s pipeline network in the parish. (Source: Shutterstock/ Williams Cos.)
A judge in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana on June 3 ruled in favor of Williams Cos. in the firm’s ongoing dispute with Energy Transfer (ETP)over Williams’ Louisiana Energy Gateway (LEG) pipeline right-of-way.
The judge ruled for Williams’ proposed seven crossings of Energy Transfer’s pipeline network in the parish.
“This court finds that the construction, operation and maintenance of LEG’s proposed pipeline would not interfere with nor affect adversely the rights of ETP’s existing pipeline servitudes in Beauregard Parish,” wrote District Judge C. Kerry Anderson in the ruling on June 3.
The overall legal process between the midstream companies involves three more court cases and a ruling from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
In an e-mail sent to Hart Energy, Williams stated, “We are pleased with the ruling received from the 36th Judicial District Court of Beauregard Parish. … This is another positive step in advancing the critical energy infrastructure needed to meet Louisiana’s, and the nation’s, demand for affordable and reliable energy.”
Energy Transfer argued that Williams’ proposed plan would cause safety issues on its already existing network. Williams argued that Energy Transfer was attempting to interfere unfairly with the development of its project.
Laura Creekmur, Williams’ vice president for communications and corporate social responsibility, said that the company is now awaiting the rulings over disputed crossings in DeSoto and Sabine parishes, Louisiana while another trial in Vernon Parish, Louisiana is scheduled to start June 10.
Along with Williams, Energy Transfer has filed suit against DT Midstream (DTM) and Momentum Midstream over line crossings. An appeals judge in April ruled in favor of DTM in its case.
Energy Transfer has also sought a ruling from FERC over Williams’ planned LEG crossing at the Louisiana-Texas border, filing a protest in April, saying that the crossing should be considered a transmission line, which would require federal oversight, as opposed to a gathering system. Williams responded that the facility does not meet the requirements for transmission lines.
Williams has moved back the completion date for the LEG project from late 2024 to the second half of 2025 after finding alternative routes that don’t cross ET’s network as a precaution.
Recommended Reading
Puerto Rican Board Delays $20B New Fortress Contract
2025-07-10 - The Financial Oversight and Management Board says the deal needs more examination.
NatGas in Storage Falls Short of Forecast
2025-07-10 - U.S. natural gas levels rose during the week ending July 4, but remain well below totals for 2024.
Construction on Mississippi Gas Storage Project Gets Go-Ahead
2025-07-09 - Enstor Gas has targeted a 2028 in-service date for a 33.5 Bcf natural gas storage project in Mississippi.
Open Season Called for NatGas Transport North of Permian
2025-07-02 - The Palo Duro Pipeline is a 275-mile route that will carry gas from Nolan to Wheeler counties in Texas.
Supreme Court to Consider Enbridge Line 5 Case Dispute
2025-06-30 - The Supreme Court’s decision will not decide the ultimate outcome for Enbridge's Line 5 pipeline project.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.