OPEC might not quite have the publicity clout of a tabloid couple, but it’s getting pretty close.
In the weeks leading up to its May 25 meeting, pundits were scurrying to predict the cartel’s next move. And once the announcement was made—another nine-month extension on supply restraint—email inboxes around the globe began to bulge at the seams.
There is nowhere near enough space in this column to cover the uproar, but I did find a few morsels particularly noteworthy. Of particular interest, of course, is the impact on and reaction of the shale players. After the first round of cuts was announced in 2016, U.S. operators responded quickly, boosting the rig count by 270 and growing production by 200 Mbbl/d since November 2016.
Andrew Slaughter, executive director for Deloitte’s Center for Energy Solutions, noted just prior to the OPEC meeting that despite these increases, shale “won’t come close to offsetting OPEC production cuts on its own.” Noting that continued cuts would stimulate continued growth, he wrote, “However, it is clear that U.S. production increases do not offset OPEC cuts, and thus the overall state of global oil markets is more dependent on inventory drawdowns than U.S. production.”
On the other hand, Rystad Energy forecasts that U.S. oil production could reach an all-time high during 2017, nearing 10 MMbbl/d by the end of the year. Rystad’s analysts are showing U.S. production growing at 95 Mbbl/ month during the year. “All of this growth stems from shale drilling as the more modest growth from Gulf of Mexico [GoM] deepwater fields is offsetting declines from other U.S. declining fields,” the report noted.
Given the potential for this type of growth, it’s not surprising that OPEC members are starting to pay more attention to the shale players. A Reuters article noted that U.S. bankers were among the attendees at the recent meeting in Vienna, and OPEC officials are planning a trip to Texas to determine whether or not the two groups can play nicely.
The article also stated, “OPEC’s latest calculus acknowledges the global clout of shale but seeks to hinder its growth by keeping just enough supply on the market to hold prices below $60 per barrel.”
But are shale players the only threat? Regarding the aforementioned deepwater GoM, Wood Mackenzie reported that through streamlined operations and a focus on core areas, some operators can break even at $50/bbl. And after suffering through cost overruns and project delays, Kashagan is making a comeback, according to Daniel Johnston of Daniel Johnston & Co. Inc., who spoke at a recent conference. “Kashagan is on the verge of finally potentially meeting some of its promises,” Johnston said.
Perhaps an OPEC visit to Kazakhstan is in order.
Contact the author at rduey@hartenergy.com.
Recommended Reading
Markman: Is MethaneSAT Watching You? Yes.
2024-04-05 - EDF’s MethaneSAT is the first satellite devoted exclusively to methane and it is targeting the oil and gas space.
US Finalizes Big Reforms to Federal Oil, Gas Drilling
2024-04-12 - Under the new policy, drilling is limited in wildlife and cultural areas and oil and gas companies will pay higher bonding rates to cover the cost of plugging abandoned oil and gas wells, among other higher rates and costs.
US EPA Expected to Drop Hydrogen from Power Plant Rule, Sources Say
2024-04-22 - The move reflects skepticism within the U.S. government that the technology will develop quickly enough to become a significant tool to decarbonize the electricity industry.
Exclusive: Dan Romito Urges Methane Mitigation Game Plan
2024-04-08 - Dan Romito, the consulting partner at Pickering Energy Partners, says evading mitigation responsibility is "naive" as methane detection technology and regulation are focusing on oil and gas companies, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
New US Rules Seek to Curb Leaks From Drilling on Public Lands
2024-03-27 - The U.S. Interior Department finalized rules aimed at limiting methane leaks from oil and gas drilling on public lands.